- Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
- U.S. chemical sites vulnerable despite millions spent on security: Congress
- Driverless cars to hit the British streets by 2015
Company wants exemption from FEC on disclaimers on political ads on smartphones
Question of the Day
A D.C.-based media firm is petitioning the Federal Election Commission to exempt political advertisements on mobile and smartphones from standard ad sponsor disclaimers as campaign messaging adapts to ever-changing technologies.
The company, Revolution Messaging, says that such a move makes sense given the space restraints on handheld devices, including the new versions of the iPhone.
“Many of our clients have been unable to take advantage of mobile advertising capabilities after being told they need to include a disclaimer,” said Keegan Goudiss, the company’s partner and head of digital advertising. “It’s an impossible request because the disclaimer would end up larger than the ad itself.”
The FEC already offers exemptions for bumper stickers, buttons and other campaign gear that companies say are too small to make the disclaimer language practical.
“It is clear to us that mobile advertising should fall in that same category,” said Revolution founder and CEO Scott Goodstein, who built out President Obama’s mobile and social media strategy during the 2008 campaign as his campaign’s external online director.
Revolution’s petition says that even the latest smartphones and smartphones do not have screens larger than 5 diagonal inches — the iPhone 5 measures 4 inches diagonally, the Samsung Galaxy S4 measures 5 inches, and the Blackberry 10 is 4.2 inches. Banner ads, not surprisingly, tend to be significantly smaller than that.
A disclaimer would thus risk falling afoul of the requirement that ads be “clear and conspicuous” — if it did not dwarf the ad entirely, Revolution says.
The company has encountered several mobile advertising vendors that refuse to accept ads unless a disclaimer is included. Such disclaimers on television and radio ads have political candidates “approving this message” in either a live shot or with a voice-over accompanied by an image of the candidate.
The Interactive Advertising Bureau limits the dimensions of the largest available ad to 320 by 50 pixels, and Revolution is requesting a “small item” exemption on standard sizes of 320 by 50 or smaller.
A spokesman for the FEC said in an email that the commission does not comment on actions that may come before it and that each case is based on a unique set of circumstances. But the commission has decided in the past that some limited-character ads, like text messages, for example, are exempt from the disclaimer requirements.
Revolution provides an example of how a 14-word disclaimer would take up more than 40 percent of the available space on a banner ad in which the political message is only 10 words.
“Even if the Commission were to craft a shorter alternate disclaimer, the number of pixels required to ensure that the disclaimer is legible and easy to read would prevent political advertisers from using mobile advertisements as a medium to communicate with voters,” lawyers for the company write in the request.
Alternatively, the company asks for an exemption based on the idea that disclaimers are impracticable for such ads.
Revolution was involved in last year’s FEC decision to allow political donations via text message for the first time, and it has petitioned the commission to outline regulations in order to stop political text message spam.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Trips, loans for McDonnell family detailed at trial
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell's wife had 'crush' on CEO
- Wilder, Cuccinelli may be called as witnesses in McDonnell trial
- Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's trial to test definitions of political corruption
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Senate overcomes first filibuster of Obama's border-spending bill
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world