Inside the Beltway: Airing the GOP’s laundry

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

These were once internal family squabbles, dismissed as growing pains for a Republican Party in search of itself.

Now they are public family squabbles under the careful scrutiny of major pollsters who ponder the ongoing “internal dissent” in the GOP, and its potential side effects.

GOP congressional leaders face mounting disapproval among tea party Republicans. Just 27 percent of Republicans and GOP leaners who agree with the tea party approve of the job Republican leaders in Congress are doing, compared with 71 percent who disapprove,” says a new Pew Research Center poll.

As Republicans practice their legislative dance moves to defund or defang Obamacare, tea partyers have framed them as villains.

“The GOP leadership had the opportunity to galvanize Americans and make a real difference. Instead it is more business as usual with games, tricks and gimmicks that stick American families with the costs of Obamacare,” says Jenny Beth Martin, national coordinator of Tea Party Patriots. “The ruling elite in the House, and their shell-game with our money, aren’t fooling us.”

Pew says that the job rating of GOP leaders among tea party Republicans has fallen 15 points in six months, from 42 percent to 27 percent. “Disapproval has risen from 54 percent to 71 percent over this period,” the findings say. Now there’s a price affixed to the squabbles.

“This internal dissent contributes to the lower job ratings Republican leaders receive from the public when compared with Democratic congressional leaders,” Pew says. The Democrats’ advantage “stems from the substantially more positive job ratings they receive from their own base: 57 percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners approve of how Democratic congressional leaders are handling their job.”

Pew concludes, “There is no internal ideological divide within the Democratic Party, as the GOP leadership faces.”

THE O’BAGY HEADLINES

She has captured the press instantly, for sure. That would be Elizabeth O'Bagy. She is the young researcher who was fired from her job as a think tank analyst Wednesday for fibbing about her credentials, despite penning a Wall Street Journal op-ed urging the U.S. to support Syrian rebels that was cited by both Secretary of State John F. Kerry and Sen. John McCain when they urged military intervention following chemical attacks on civilians in the war-torn nation. A selection of headlines:

“From anonymous to media star to unemployed in a week” (National Public Radio); “Lost in credibility gulch” (Esquire); “Who funds Syrian rebel advocate O'Bagy and the Syrian Emergency Task Force? You do” (Daily Caller), “Obama relying on student’s spin on Syria?” (World Net Daily), “State Dept. funds O'Bagy’s pro-rebel Syria lobbying” (Pajamas Media).

WEINER HOUR ON MSNBC?

It worked for former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, at least for a while. Now media observers wonder when Anthony D. Weiner will answer his true calling as a cable TV property, now that he’s out of the Big Apple’s mayoral race.

“While many speculate on Weiner’s future career prospects, here’s one job that actually embraces the egomaniacal side of humanity: cable news host,” observes Mediaite analyst Andrew Kirell, who points out that much cable news is entertainment, like pro wrestling.

“Weiner has consistently shown that he can act without regard for other people’s feelings; he is unafraid to confront his opponents; he has strong opinions about seemingly everything; he’s good at yelling; and he has name recognition that he would love to continue riding,” Mr. Kirell says. “What does that all sound like? A cable host.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks