You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

EDITORIAL: Budget blarney

The biggest spender in history celebrates his ‘parsimony’

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

President Obama is a master of fiscal discipline, or so he says. "Our deficits are falling at the fastest rate in 60 years," he told an audience the other day at Knox College in Illinois. It is true that the federal deficit is on track to be the lowest since Mr. Obama took office, but there's a catch.

Figures released last week by the Congressional Budget Office show that, so far this year, the government has spent $753 billion more than it has taken in. It's on track to an $815 billion annual deficit at the end of the fiscal year. That's down almost a third from last year's $1.1 trillion deficit. Such a reduction sounds like he's making good on promises to rein in the endless spending blowout. Mr. Obama assured the nation that things would be different on his watch.

"We cannot and will not sustain deficits like these [i.e., like those of George W. Bush] without end," he said shortly after taking office, affecting the fierce demeanor of a small-town Republican banker. "We cannot simply spend as we please and defer the consequences to the next budget, the next administration or the next generation."

Nice work if you can get it, but you can't. Mr. Obama's deficits are setting records, but not in the way the White House wants people to think. Since 2009, his administration's cumulative deficits add up to $6.8 trillion, not merely triple George W. Bush's $2 trillion tab, but more than every single president from George Washington to President Bush. The present deficit is nearly double that of Mr. Bush's last and worst year in office, and a long way from the average $250 billion deficit Mr. Bush carried through his eight-year term.

No matter how the numbers are sliced, Mr. Obama is history's biggest spender. This year's deficit is more than the $742 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars that Franklin D. Roosevelt borrowed in 1943 to fight World War II. None of Mr. Obama's undertakings can be remotely compared to the costs of that war.

It's typical of the math that only works in Washington that Mr. Obama increases spending to an unprecedented level and claims credit when expenditures dip ever so slightly. His administration did everything it could to prevent such a dip. Had Mr. Obama's original budget been adopted we would be spending $300 billion more this year than we actually spent, raising the deficit to $1.1 trillion.

Credit for the deficit reduction, such as it is, goes to House Republicans, who have used continuing resolutions to keep government spending in a virtual freeze. That's a step in the right direction, but it's not good enough.

When Mr. Obama took office, the national debt stood at $10.6 trillion; it's now at $16.7 trillion. Instead of leaving our children "with a debt they cannot repay," Mr. Obama would leave our grandchildren and their children with a debt they can't escape.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts