- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: ‘Get yourself some firearms’
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: A Kennedy-Khrushchev redux?
Question of the Day
The last time that a U.S. president looked as weak to a Russian leader as President Obama looks to Russian President Vladimir Putin was back in the early 1960s when Nikita Khrushchev regarded John F. Kennedy as a lightweight.
Early in his administration, Kennedy didn’t react when the North Vietnamese, in blatant violation of the 1954 Geneva Accords, began to build the Ho Chi Minh Trail through Laos to supply rebels in South Vietnam. Shortly afterward, he authorized the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, but failed to provide the naval and air support, without which the attack had to fail. He then acquiesced when the East Germans began to build the Berlin Wall. All this led Khrushchev in September 1962 to tell the visiting poet Robert Frost that Kennedy was “too liberal to fight.” He had already begun to install intercontinental ballistic missiles in Cuba.
During the ensuing Cuban missile crisis, the world almost ended. It didn’t, in large part because the Soviets backed off, but only after Kennedy secretly committed that the United States would never invade Cuba and would remove American Jupiter missiles from their Turkish base — then lied to the American people about doing so.
Will Mr. Putin push a demonstrably weakened Mr. Obama as hard as Khrushchev pushed Kennedy? We already know that, echoing what America was compelled to do 50 years ago, one condition being imposed on the United States is a pledge not to attack Syria. America can’t give up missiles stationed close to Russia, because in 2009 Mr. Obama canceled plans for anti-ballistic missile batteries to be built in Poland and the Czech Republic. Certainly, Mr. Putin will press his advantage, requiring that Mr. Obama show even more of the “flexibility” that he promised Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev in 2012. What more will the president be made to give up secretly in order to save face lost by his feckless Middle East policy decisions?
TWT Video Picks
By Robert N. Tracci
Congress must use its appropriations power to secure the border
Get Breaking Alerts
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- A 'new Cold War': China's top paper warns of 'slippery slope' towards conflict with U.S.
- Pentagon's self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: 'We cannot afford to wait on Congress' for immigration
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
- New York City creates ID card so 500K illegal immigrants can get services
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: 'Get yourself some firearms'
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- Homeland Security adviser tweets America is 'Islamic country'
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: How many boondoggles to break the bank?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The problem is unenforced borders
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Where are condolences for Jewish teens' deaths?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama welcomes illegals, ignores Americans
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama has no intention of repatriating illegals