- Smile: Equipping cops with body-mounted cameras gains steam in Calif., N.Y.
- Obama to sign bill cutting taxpayer money for party conventions
- Half of Americans worried about second Cold War: poll
- Kermit Gosnell clinic aide who heard aborted baby scream gets 5 to 10 years in prison
- Iraq mulls law to let men marry 8-year-old girls
- Russia sends bombers on 24-hour Arctic patrol
- Sam Adams beer brewer nixes St. Patrick’s parade that won’t allow gays
- Houston dad kills boy, 17, in daughter’s room in mistaken ID tragedy
- Rep. David Jolly ready to work with Democrats on compromise
- Joe Biden: I can’t be president — my golf would suffer
Cruise missiles unlikely to deter Syrian regime, analysts say
Tomahawks lack bunker-busting ability, poor on mobile targets
“We continue to refine our targeting based on the most recent intelligence, and the [Joint Chiefs] chairman assured the president that we would have appropriate targeting options ready when he called for them,” said Air Force Col. Ed Thomas, spokesman for Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. “We will remain ready to execute military options whenever the president directs it.”
The aircraft carrier USS Nimitz and four other ships in its strike group moved into the Red Sea early Monday, U.S. defense officials said, describing the move as “prudent planning” in case the ships are needed for action against Syria.
Meanwhile, five Navy destroyers, submarines and an amphibious assault ship with Marines on board remain ready in the eastern Mediterranean.
Military officials acknowledge that a one-time operation might not be enough to deter the Assad regime.
“It is not that we will punch them in the nose and run away. We will punch them in the nose and ask, ‘Do you want more?’” an unnamed U.S. defense official said in a story Saturday in The Wall Street Journal.
Gen. Dempsey himself has advocated several times against direct intervention in Syria, writing in a July 19 letter to the Senate: “Once we take action, we should be prepared for what comes next. Deeper involvement is hard to avoid.”
“As we weigh our options, we should be able to conclude with some confidence that the use of force will move us toward the intended outcome,” he wrote.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
By Bob Dole
The industrious island has proved itself worthy of U.S. inclusion
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- College group's diversity event canceled after excluding white people
- Sam Adams beer brewer nixes St. Patrick's parade that won't allow gays
- Deportations come mostly from border, DHS chief says
- F-35 secrets now showing up in Chinas stealth fighter
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- MILLER: Law enforcement realizes good people with guns deter crime
- U.S.: Malaysia plane's on-board communications purposely shut down
- BRUCE: The power of bossy
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014