- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: ‘Get yourself some firearms’
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Sessions not a true conservative
Question of the Day
In your recent editorial ("The circular firing squad," Web, Sept. 18), you make the claim that Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas is a conservative. However, our conversations with the grass roots in Texas and our analysis of his voting record tell us that you are wrong.
Mr. Sessions voted for the TARP bailout, he supported the "fiscal cliff" tax deal that resulted in higher taxes for 80 percent of Americans, and he voted to raise the debt ceiling. Just this year, he voted for the bloated farm bill that included close to $1 trillion in spending — nearly 80 percent of which was for food stamps. The Times called the bill's defeat in the House "encouraging" and highlighted the fact that conservatives wanted the food-stamp aid separated from the farm bill, but that was not allowed. As chairman of the Rules Committee, Mr. Sessions had the authority to allow separate votes on the farm subsidies and food-stamp portions of the bill, but he didn't use it. Now, how is that conservative?
This brings us to Obamacare and the "trick rule" the House was going to adopt, which would allow the Senate to drop a provision that defunded Obamacare without a confirming vote in the House. This was an extremely deceptive approach that was scrapped after we, other conservative organizations and Americans from across the country, voiced opposition. If Mr. Sessions had written that rule in the House, he would certainly deserve a primary challenge for such a dishonest attempt to fund a program his constituents opposed.
If Mr. Sessions supports funding for Obamacare, that is his choice, but he should openly acknowledge it and be prepared to deal with the political consequences.
Senate Conservatives Fund
TWT Video Picks
By Robert N. Tracci
Congress must use its appropriations power to secure the border
Get Breaking Alerts
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Pentagon's self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- A 'new Cold War': China's top paper warns of 'slippery slope' towards conflict with U.S.
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: 'We cannot afford to wait on Congress' for immigration
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
- Obama calls GOP lawsuit over executive overreach a 'political stunt'
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: 'Get yourself some firearms'
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Veteran with concealed weapon turns tables on Chicago gunman
- New York City creates ID card so 500K illegal immigrants can get services
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: How many boondoggles to break the bank?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The problem is unenforced borders
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Where are condolences for Jewish teens' deaths?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama welcomes illegals, ignores Americans
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama has no intention of repatriating illegals