Sequester doesn’t cut agencies’ year-end spending sprees

continued from page 1

An IRS spokeswoman said that mentality has changed. The agency has made big strides in culling extraneous spending and will “continue to look for additional savings as the fiscal year winds down,” she said.

The Navy is handling its fourth-quarter spending habits similarly to many other agencies. Since budgets have been tighter, the Navy has had to stick to its monthly spending plan more closely, meaning less remains at the end of the year, a Navy official said.

Another military command is not under the same budget stress as the Navy and is having a “very normal” month. The Army Corps of Engineers made no change to its typical end-of-year spending habits because of sequestration.

“This has been a busy and very normal September for us procedurally,” spokesman Gene Pawlik said in a statement. “Sequestration, while it reduced our [fiscal 2013] funding once enacted, did not impose any unusual requirements for us in the 4th quarter with respect to fiscal execution.”

Some agencies were less transparent with their year-end spending decisions.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives would not comment on how its spending is going, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Environmental Protection Agency did not respond to requests asking about their year-end priorities.

Other agencies said they were experiencing little change because of how they are set up. The National Science Foundation noted that its yearly spending plan allows for all money to be allocated before the end of the fiscal year through things like academic grants, while a spokeswoman for the General Services Administration said it was not affected by sequestration but still was “committed to finding ways to save taxpayer dollars.”

The Department of Housing and Urban Development could not comment on the full impact of sequestration on the budget until the end of the fiscal year, said the deputy secretary of the department.

“Because of sequestration, HUD offices were closed to the public for five days, and there were no walk-in services available to members of the public,” Maurice Jones said in a statement. “While the immediate impacts of sequestration will be measured at the end of the fiscal year, there will be other impacts that will not be felt for months or years to come.”

A spokeswoman from the National Institutes of Health said the organization may spend more in the fourth quarter this year, but only because the funding did not come through until the end of the second quarter because of the budget and spending battles throughout the year on Capitol Hill.

“To the extent that sequestration played a role in delaying congressional decisions on FY 2013 appropriations, it may have had an impact on the proportion of total spending done in the fourth quarter,” she said in a statement.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Transportation Security Administration declined to comment and referred questions to the Department of Homeland Security. Spokeswoman Marsha Catron would say only that the department has tried to save money for years.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks