- Appeals court upholds Obamacare tax as constitutional
- As fighting in Gaza rages on, Kerry’s credibility questioned
- New Englander Scott Brown turns his gaze to the U.S. border crisis
- Toronto’s Rob Ford takes rehabbed self to kids’ playground for political props
- Sen. Joe Manchin sued by his brother over old loan: report
- New Mexico decides to use HealthCare.gov for 2015
- Satanists to use Hobby Lobby rule to skirt state abortion laws
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- HHS: ‘Donut hole’ reforms saved Medicare enrollees $11.5 billion since 2010
- Boston-area tornado rips 100 homes: ‘Are we in Kansas?’
Ill., N.J. judges rule in favor of same-sex marriage
Question of the Day
Judges in New Jersey and Illinois handed gay marriage supporters favorable decisions Friday, with one ruling setting Oct. 21 as the date when gay marriages can commence in New Jersey.
“The ineligibility of same-sex couples for federal benefits is currently harming same-sex couples in New Jersey in a wide range of contexts,” Mercer County Superior Court Judge Mary Jacobson said in her ruling.
The federal government now recognizes same-sex married couples for federal benefits, Judge Jacobson wrote. Since New Jersey does not, however, recognize couples in civil unions, couples there “cannot access many federal marital benefits,” she said. Therefore, “this court holds that New Jersey’s denial of marriage to same-sex couples now violates” the state Constitution.
New Jersey officials have until Oct. 21 to respond to the ruling in Garden State Equality v. Dow.
Gov. Chris Christie has vetoed a bill to perform gay marriages; New Jersey lawmakers have several more months to attempt to override the veto.
A response from the Christie administration wasn’t immediately available Friday. But the state has argued that New Jersey’s civil union law is legal, and federal agencies should respect New Jersey’s domestic-relationship laws when it confers benefits to same-sex couples.
If that doesn’t happen, the plaintiffs’ quarrel is with the federal government, not New Jersey, Kevin Jespersen of the New Jersey Attorney General’s office argued in August before Judge Jacobson.
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act, and the federal government began recognizing the legal state marriages of gay couples. Lambda Legal asked for an emergency ruling on behalf of Garden State Equality and six gay couples and their children, saying because they were only allowed to be in civil unions, they were likely to be discriminated against.
“We argued that limiting lesbians and gay men to civil union is unfair and unconstitutional, and now the court has agreed,” Hayley Gorenberg, Lambda Legal’s deputy legal director, said Friday.
“Today’s court decision affirms what loving and committed couples in New Jersey have known all along: civil union is no substitute for the protections and dignity of marriage,” said Evan Wolfson, founder and president of Freedom to Marry.
Meanwhile, in Illinois, a judge ruled Friday that a gay marriage lawsuit can go forward, but on fewer claims.
Cook County Circuit Judge Sophia H. Hall dismissed three of the five claims in a lawsuit filed by 25 gay couples that seeks to overturn an Illinois law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
But Judge Hall declined to dismiss the case, and arguments will be heard on whether the 1996 Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act violates the state Constitution’s clauses guaranteeing due process and equal protection.
Although the court dismissed some of the claims, “the plaintiffs can obtain everything they seek — a declaration that the marriage ban is unconstitutional and an order requiring the state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples — through the claims that remain,” said Lambda Legal, one of the groups representing the gay couples. The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois also represents some of the couples.
Illinois state officials have declined to defend the law, saying it is unconstitutional. However, five Illinois county clerks stepped up instead. Their request to dismiss the case was denied by Judge Hall on Friday.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Events honoring 20th National Parents' Day reaffirm family
- '50 Shades' movie trailer outrages anti-porn groups
- Tougher clinic rules lead to drop in Texas abortions
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Rush Limbaugh: 'There is no journalism anymore'
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world