- Berkshire County eschews greenback for own currency — BerkShares
- Hagel warns Pakistani leaders of U.S. aid losses over drone-strike protests
- Florida authorities ban autistic boy from owning therapeutic chickens
- Defendant in Lee Rigby machete murder trial: ‘I love al Qaeda’
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, ‘cherry-picked’ intelligence: report
- MSNBC host: Obamacare a ‘wealthy white men’ racist word
- Democrat thwarts Nevada activist’s try to name peak after Reagan
- Congress ready to extend ban on plastic firearms
- Rogue reindeer runs from Santa, eludes police for hours
- Iran touts new laser that bolsters missile accuracy
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Syria strike would be submission
President Obama’s forthcoming attack on Syria has nothing to do with Syria (“McCain: Rejection of Syria war resolution would be ‘catastrophic,’” Web, Sept. 2). It is a war in defense of internationalism, and the enemy is not a regime in Syria, but rather the very idea that America should consider itself anything other than fully subordinate to international rule. How else to explain Mr. Obama’s attitude, both resigned and enthusiastic, toward the inevitability of this war, as though violations of “international norms” automatically compel America to act, whether we wish it or not? This is why Congress isn’t being consulted. Congress represents the American people and American interests, so to consult Congress is to acknowledge that American interests should control America’s direction. This is untenable for the left, which for some time now has wished to reduce America from its position as an autonomous superpower.
Under President George W. Bush the issue was whether America was justified in acting without the support of the international community. But under Mr. Obama the issue is whether America may withhold support when the international community, international law or internationalism itself demands it. This is not an insignificant difference. The former required permission, but the latter requires submission. That’s much more dangerous, and it represents an enormous leap toward the erosion of American autonomy. This is what you get when you elect a self-described “citizen of the world” as your president.
JORDAN B. RICKARDS
North Brunswick, N.J.
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
Get Breaking Alerts
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Tech companies call for an end to NSA online snooping
- WOLF: The president's other Obamacare lies
- Satanists petition for statue at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- MSNBC host: Obamacare a 'wealthy white men' racist word
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Ted Cruz sees legal landmines ahead for Obamacare
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist