- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
Obama lobbies Congress, defends plan for Syria strike
Question of the Day
Meeting with top lawmakers at the White House, President Obama on Tuesday morning defended his plan for a “proportional” response against the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad and pledged to continue working with Congress to achieve at least some level of consensus on military action.
“The key point I want to emphasize to the American people — the military plan that has been developed by our Joint Chiefs … does not involve boots on the ground. This is not Iraq. This is not Afghanistan. This is a limited, proportional step,” the president said, flanked by House Speaker John Boehner, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and other members in the Cabinet Room.
Congress is set to vote next week on authorizing military action against the Syrian regime in what would be a direct response to what U.S. analysts have concluded was Mr. Assad’s use of sarin gas against his own people outside Damascus last month. The use of chemical weapons in the ongoing Syrian civil war, Mr. Obama has said, must carry consequences from the international community.
But there remains much doubt as to whether Congress will approve such military action, with some members worried the U.S. will once again find itself bogged down in a Middle Eastern conflict without an endgame or clear objective for victory.
“I think it is appropriate that we act deliberately, but I think everybody recognizes the urgency here,” Mr. Obama said. “I would not be going to Congress if I was not serious about consultations” with lawmakers ahead of any military strikes.
Mr. Obama said he was willing to allow Congress to narrow the scope of his proposed military strikes, “so long as we are accomplishing what needs to be accomplished.”
He said the U.S. must “send a clear message to Assad, degrading his capabilities to use chemical weapons, not just now, but in the future.”
“As long as the authorization allows us to do that, I’m confident that we’re going to come up with something that hits that mark,” Mr. Obama said.
Skeptics on the Hill
Some lawmakers in both parties have criticized the president’s request to authorize military action as too broad and open-ended.
In defending his plan, the president said lack of action by the U.S. will send a negative message around the world. Other nations, he added, must know the use of chemical weapons will not be tolerated.
“We recognize there are certain weapons that when used can not only end up resulting in grotesque deaths but also … can pose a risk to allies and friends of ours, like Israel, like Jordan, like Turkey,” he said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Dave Boyer is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times. A native of Allentown, Pa., Boyer worked for the Philadelphia Inquirer from 2002 to 2011 and also has covered Congress for the Times. He is a graduate of Penn State University. Boyer can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Biden: U.S., world 'will not accept' a nuclear-armed North Korea
- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on 'outdated' agencies
- Biden leaves with no concessions from China, heads next to South Korea
- Biden in Beijing: From diplomat to tourist on taxpayer dime
- Susan Rice slams Russia, China on human rights
Latest Blog Entries
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obama, first lady will attend Mandela memorial services
- Obama: Nelson Mandela now 'belongs to the ages'
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
- Obama calls on bartenders to help sell health care reform
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
Latest Blog Entries
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Colorado judge: Bakery owner discriminated against gay couple
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- KUHNER: Who betrayed Navy SEAL Team 6?
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!