- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Maryland gun-law foes eye 11th-hour reprieve
Attorney general asks why plaintiffs waited to bring suit
Question of the Day
Maryland dealers said they were seeing unprecedented sales in the hours before stringent new gun laws were to take effect Tuesday.
But even as state officials prepared to enact the restrictions, a federal judge was expected to consider a last-minute bid by opponents to block their implementation.
A U.S. District Court judge in Baltimore was scheduled to hear arguments at 11 a.m. Tuesday from plaintiffs in a lawsuit seeking to declare the Firearms Safety Act of 2013 unconstitutional. The plaintiffs filed for a temporary restraining act to block the new laws, which are considered to be among the toughest in the nation.
Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler's office argued in court papers filed Monday that the very fact that plaintiffs waited six months from the time the General Assembly passed the act to challenge it should preclude them from having a judge grant their motion for a temporary restraining order.
"Notwithstanding their keen awareness of, and vehement opposition to, this legislation even before it was enacted, the plaintiffs made a calculated decision to wait to bring their legal challenge until the eve of the law's effective date," state lawyers wrote in response to the motion.
Along with limiting handgun magazines to 10 rounds, the Maryland law adds 45 guns to a list of banned assault weapons and requires gun buyers to submit their fingerprints and obtain handgun-qualification licenses.
The lawsuit argues, among other things, that the new laws violate the Second Amendment by arbitrarily outlawing certain guns and prohibiting features and accessories that promote their effective and efficient use. It also says the prohibition on magazines holding more than 10 rounds is unusual and limits a gun owner's ability to defend himself.
The state's 30-page memo takes issue with plaintiffs' claims that they have a likelihood of success in their case and that they will suffer irreparable harm if the law goes into effect — both elements of which must be proved to get a temporary restraining order to block the act.
The memo also suggested that the plaintiffs' decision to wait until two business days before the law's effective date might have been "economically rational," given that gun stores have profited from a dramatic uptick in gun sales in advance of the law.
"These claims of economic harm from the firearms dealers are particularly ironic, given the significant surge in sales of the weapons and magazines at issue in the months leading up to the effective date," lawyers said in a footnote to the memo.
Representatives for the gun stores involved in the lawsuit declined to comment, and an attorney for the plaintiffs did not respond to messages.
But gun stores across the state did brisk business Monday as prospective gun buyers attempted to complete their purchases ahead of the deadline.
Al Koch, store manager at Bart's Sports World, a Glen Burnie-based gun shop, said Monday that for the past three days a line of people had been waiting for the store to open, and he even opened his doors on Sunday — normally an off business day — so that buyers could pick up the guns they purchased.
"It's been incredible the past two weeks," Mr. Koch said. "As of yesterday, we had no handguns to sell. We sold them all. We're waiting for more to come in."
Neil Kravitz, vendor of Nsk Sales Co. in Baltimore County, said that he just returned from the Maryland State Police offices, where he handed over a 4-inch stack of gun-transfer papers.
"I've done more transfers in the last 90 days that I have in the last two years," he said. "You've never seen anything like this."
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Meredith Somers is a Metro reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obenshain concedes Virginia AG race to Herring, ending recount
- Obenshain to concede Virginia AG race
- Mega Millions players dream of a green Christmas with lottery jackpot at $636 million
- Obenshain raises ballot security issue in Va.
- Washington honors an 'African son' at Mandela service at National Cathedral
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Calling prison term disparities unfair, Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow