- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
Transportation Department program fails to root out bad contractors
Banned firms eligible for federal tax dollars
Question of the Day
A Transportation Department program designed to help women, minority and disabled owners compete for federal contracts, in fact, may be disadvantaging the very people it is intended to help by failing to root out bad actors.
The Transportation Department’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program has continued to give money to contractors in the process of being debarred or suspended for defrauding taxpayers, depriving more deserving firms of millions of dollars, the agency’s internal watchdog reports.
“Weaknesses in DBE program management and implementation have allowed ineligible firms to win DBE contracts and have left the majority of DBE firms without work,” the department’s inspector general said.
The report shines a poignant light on Uncle Sam’s continuing inability to punish wayward contractors or protect taxpayers from instances of procurement fraud.
Federal agencies are supposed to suspend or debar federal contractors who have tried to defraud taxpayers, thus preventing them from getting new business.
But the Transportation Department’s disadvantaged contracting program is so poorly managed that contractors that have been debarred or in the process of being suspended have won more funding, the report said. Nearly a third of the Transportation Department’s inspector general fraud investigations involve the program, the report said.
A sampling of the program’s contractors on eligibility lists in 26 states found three firms that were listed as permitted to receive contracts, despite being suspended or debarred.
One company was on contracting lists 20 months after it was disqualified for fraud and lying to government officials. A second remained listed despite being debarred for violating federal wage laws, and a third got an $8.1 million contract just weeks before its suspension was supposed to take effect for attempted tax fraud.
Because the inspector general sampled only some lists, it warned that the problems could be far more widespread. “Instances like those we found point to the possibility that other ineligible firms may be listed on state DBE directories,” the report said.
The investigators blamed Transportation Department officials for failing to provide “guidance and training to safeguard against federally funded awards to firms that are suspended or debarred.”
Agency officials brushed off the criticism, issuing a statement highlighting the success of the program instead of its red flags. “Thanks to the DBE program, small and disadvantaged businesses were able to successfully compete for contracting valued at more than $4.4 billion,” the Transportation Department said.
“The department will continue to review existing guidance and program implementation to determine whether there are useful and cost effective means to make further improvements,” it said.
Investigators remain unhappy, fearing the program is placing more emphasis on getting businesses qualified for the program than screening them or finding them work.
“Recipients focus most of their efforts on helping firms complete the lengthy DBE certification process, leaving few resources in place to help certified firms obtain DBE work on federally funded projects,” the inspector general warned.
Private companies are supposed to submit annual paperwork showing they haven’t been banned, but the inspector general said it can be unreliable. One company lied on its paperwork to show it was still eligible despite having been suspended.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Phillip Swarts is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times, covering fiscal waste, fraud and political ethics. He is a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University and previously worked as an investigative reporter for the Washington Guardian. Phillip can be reached at email@example.com.
- Christians flee Mosul after ISIL threat: Convert to Islam or die
- Ex-Gitmo detainee Moazzam Begg charged with terrorism
- Chicago shooting spree: 22 people shot in 12 hours
- U.S. bests Iran to advance to the Gold Medal match at the FIVB World League Finals
- Bill Maher blames Hamas for Gaza violence: 'Do you really expect the Israelis not to retaliate?'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Michael Widlanski
Leveling the battlefield to aid terrorists enables evil to fight on
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Cutler wins endorsement from gun control group
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Man says he shot burglar who said she was pregnant
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq