- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Obama makes fiery case for action in Syria
Question of the Day
Making his most passionate plea to date for military strikes in Syria, President Obama on Wednesday said the credibility of the United States — and that of the international community as a whole — is on the line, and a failure to act against the regime of Bashar Assad will embolden war criminals, dictators and despots for years to come.
Speaking at a press conference in Stockholm, Mr. Obama said he believes Congress ultimately will approve action against Mr. Assad's government, which U.S. intelligence officials have concluded has used chemical weapons against its own people repeatedly in the country's ongoing civil war.
Although Mr. Obama explicitly cited the use of chemical weapons in Syria as a "red line" for him in April, he argued in Sweden that the original red line was laid down by the world community, not by him, in its past treaties and bans on the use of chemical weapons.
"The international community's credibility is on the line. And America's and Congress' credibility is on the line because we give lip service to the notion that these international norms are important," Mr. Obama said, with Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt alongside him. "I do think we have to act. Because if we don't, we are effectively saying that even though we may condemn it and issue resolutions and so forth and so on, somebody who is not shamed by resolutions can continue to act with impunity and those international norms begin to erode and other despots and authoritarian regimes can start looking and saying, 'That's something we can get away with.'"
He also admonished other world leaders to "admit it" if they're looking for a way to avoid taking action.
"Are we going to try to find a reason not to act? If that's the case, I think the world community should admit it," Mr. Obama said. "You can always find a reason not act."
While much of the press conference focused specifically on Syria, Mr. Obama also was asked the bigger-picture question of how he's reconciling his calls for military strikes with the fact that he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 — an award he told reporters he felt "unworthy" of when compared to past recipients.
Speaking deliberately, Mr. Obama described how the Syrian conflict is just the latest example of "the challenge all of us face when we believe in peace but we confront a world that is full of violence."
"The question that all of us face, not just me, our citizens face, not just political leaders [is]: At what point do we say we need to confront actions that are violating our common humanity? I would argue that when I see 400 children subjected to gas ... the moral thing to do is not to stand by and do nothing," Mr. Obama said. "But it's difficult. This is the part of my job that I find most challenging. I would much rather be talking about how to make sure every 3- and 4-year-old gets a good education than I would spending time thinking about how can I prevent 3- and 4-year-olds from being subjected to chemical weapons and nerve gas."
Mr. Reinfeldt agreed that action must be taken against the Assad government, but he said that the United Nations must lead the charge. In fact, when pressed by an American reporter, he made clear that Sweden — regardless of what the U.S. decides to do — will follow the lead of the U.N.
"Just to remind you: You are now in Sweden, a small country with a deep belief in the United Nations," he said, adding that he believes that before making any final decisions, it is best to wait for a full report from U.N. inspectors who investigated chemical weapons use in the Syrian conflict.
But any action by the U.N. looks unlikely, with Russia already having blocked a Security Council resolution that simply condemned the sarin gas attacks without even assigning blame.
Any military action or resolution carrying real consequences surely would be blocked by Russia, a key ally of Mr. Assad's, and possibly by China as well.
With the British Parliament having already rejected military intervention, it appears the U.S. once again will do the heavy lifting in a Middle Eastern conflict.
Before any action is taken, intervention will be voted on in Congress; that process could begin as early as Wednesday.
A key Senate panel is expected to soon vote on a new resolution authorizing military force but also establishing a 90-day timetable for action and explicitly prohibiting any American ground troops in Syria. A similar proposal is being discussed in the House.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- White House says it's open to 45 of panel's proposed 46 NSA changes
- President gets budget win -- but only by staying out of negotiations
- 'There's something about moms:' White House enlists mothers to sell Obamacare
- White House hints Olympic envoys a shot at Putin over gay rights
- Under pressure, White House to unveil key surveillance report
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Calling sentence disparities unfair, Obama pardons 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Crystal Wright is a black conservative woman living in Washington, D.C.
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow