- NYC’s de Blasio seeks to ban wood-burning fireplaces
- Residents angry Obama mispronounced town’s name during mudslide visit
- Israel halts peace talks with Palestinians
- Netanyahu’s driver accused of raping girls under age 12
- Putin calls Internet ‘CIA project’ that must be controlled
- Muslims offended that 9/11 museum movie speaks of jihad
- Obama marks Armenian massacre, avoids using the word ‘genocide’
- Gov. Rick Perry: ‘It’s not a dare, it’s a promise’; Texas will fight BLM
- Howard Dean cheers Obama’s approach to Russian aggression
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s childhood nickname? ‘The Surprise’
Sen. Marco Rubio on Syria: ‘May have reached a point now where there is no good outcome possible’
Sen. Marco Rubio said that because of U.S. inaction in Syria for the past two years, a desired scenario where President Bashar Assad is toppled and replaced with a stable government "may no longer be possible."
"If he stays in power, that's obviously bad because it empowers Iran and so forth, but if he falls, it's also possible it could trigger a second civil war," the Florida Republican told CNN on Tuesday. "So we are really in a bind here, and again, directly the result of the president's mishandling of this entire situation."
Mr. Rubio said he'll hear from U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry in a closed hearing Wednesday on whether the moderate rebels battling the regime of President Bashar Assad are doing better, but that he has "serious reservations" about whether that's true. He sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, before which Mr. Kerry testified on Tuesday.
"To use a football analogy, if you're down nine points with five seconds to go in the game, there's not anything you can do to win the game, because there's no such thing as a nine-point play in football," he said. "I hate to keep going back to the same point, but we may have reached a point now where there is no good outcome possible in this conflict and again, it is the direct result of the mismanagement of this administration."
Mr. Rubio said he believes Syria does touch on the U.S.'s national security "in vital ways," but he's frustrated that the country has become "hamstrung" by the options presently available "because this president chose to lead from behind for two years."
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Supreme Court pushes consideration of N.J. gun case to April 25
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Obama avoids 'red line' for China, prepared to impose tougher sanctions on Russia
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- 'Conservatives' should feel exposed by Bundy's racist comments: Scarborough
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Rand Paul: Bundy's racist remarks are 'offensive'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014