- Sarah Palin to campaign for Senate candidate Ben Sasse in Nebraska
- Boise business entices customers to come break stuff — ‘recreational destruction’
- Fired Yahoo exec’s $60 million golden parachute may be a record
- Arkansas gynecologist snapped nude photos of patients, police say
- Anthony Weiner on his current sexting habits: ‘None of your business’
- Producers eye Capitol Hill for latest reality TV hit
- No selfie awareness: Obama, Biden mug for Instagram as Ukraine implodes
- Putin to Snowden: We don’t collect droves of data on everyone like the U.S.
- Clemson football’s new opponent: Atheists upset with player prayer, Bible study
- Toronto Mayor Rob Ford’s re-election launch party will be ‘history in the making,’ brother says
In about-face, GOP lawmaker opposes Syria strike over Obama ‘bungling’
Rep. Michael Grimm was for a military strike against Syria before he was against it.
The New York Republican said Friday on “Fox and Friends” that he changed his mind because President Obama has “bungled” the situation in Syria and said he has “lost faith” in the commander-in-chief after he failed to move faster to response to the Assad regime’s alleged use of chemical weapons.
“The window to restore our credibility has already closed,” Mr. Grimm said. “I don’t believe the president has the resolve to make this a meaningful strike to really send a message not only to Assad, but to our enemies in Iran as well.”
Mr. Grimm delivered a different message over the weekend, telling the Staten Island Advance that he supported the president’s action.
“He is going to have to strike. He should use our superior air power, our naval power. These should be targeted strikes to disable their air force and where they hold their chemical weapons. The strikes should be at hard targets, like their airfields.”
Mr. Grimm has since changed his tune.
He said Friday that Mr. Obama has stepped back from his 2012 pledge that the use of chemical weapons in Syria would “change my calculus” and that he is not convinced that American troops will not be sent into to nation to secure areas.
“I don’t think the American people have the heart for this at this time,” Mr. Grimm said, adding that the level of danger has increased over the past 72 hours. “There is no easy answer here. I admit that this is a very difficult situation, but I think the president has made it more difficult than it needed to be, and I think he has put us in a difficult situation, and now he is really passing the buck to the Congress.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Freedom Summit unofficial start to '16 GOP primary
- Eric Cantor falls hard from good graces of conservatives
- Eric Cantor pressured to skip conference by moderate GOP group
- GOP congressman: Empower states to legalize marijuana
- Gov. Jindal: GOP 2016 White House nominee should be a governor
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- CURL: The state of the Union worse than you thought
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.