- Freak lightning storm kills 1, injures many on California beach
- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
In about-face, GOP lawmaker opposes Syria strike over Obama ‘bungling’
Question of the Day
Rep. Michael Grimm was for a military strike against Syria before he was against it.
The New York Republican said Friday on “Fox and Friends” that he changed his mind because President Obama has “bungled” the situation in Syria and said he has “lost faith” in the commander-in-chief after he failed to move faster to response to the Assad regime’s alleged use of chemical weapons.
“The window to restore our credibility has already closed,” Mr. Grimm said. “I don’t believe the president has the resolve to make this a meaningful strike to really send a message not only to Assad, but to our enemies in Iran as well.”
Mr. Grimm delivered a different message over the weekend, telling the Staten Island Advance that he supported the president’s action.
“He is going to have to strike. He should use our superior air power, our naval power. These should be targeted strikes to disable their air force and where they hold their chemical weapons. The strikes should be at hard targets, like their airfields.”
Mr. Grimm has since changed his tune.
He said Friday that Mr. Obama has stepped back from his 2012 pledge that the use of chemical weapons in Syria would “change my calculus” and that he is not convinced that American troops will not be sent into to nation to secure areas.
“I don’t think the American people have the heart for this at this time,” Mr. Grimm said, adding that the level of danger has increased over the past 72 hours. “There is no easy answer here. I admit that this is a very difficult situation, but I think the president has made it more difficult than it needed to be, and I think he has put us in a difficult situation, and now he is really passing the buck to the Congress.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- GOP 2014: Republican governors cite their economic stewardship
- Perdue, Nunn square off in race for Georgia's open Senate seat
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Alison Lundergan Grimes hits Mitch McConnell over jobs
- Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff locked in dead heat
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's trial to test definitions of political corruption
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq