- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
- Heart cancels SeaWorld concert after ‘Blackfish’ documentary
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- South Africans hold day of prayer for Nelson Mandela
- Mandela not on life support in final hours, friend says
- Ukraine protesters topple, decapitate Lenin statue in Kiev
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle removed from North Korean state documentary
- Thailand crisis deepens as opposition quits Parliament
- Campbell Soup apologizes for SpaghettiOs’ Pearl Harbor tweet
In about-face, GOP lawmaker opposes Syria strike over Obama ‘bungling’
Rep. Michael Grimm was for a military strike against Syria before he was against it.
The New York Republican said Friday on “Fox and Friends” that he changed his mind because President Obama has “bungled” the situation in Syria and said he has “lost faith” in the commander-in-chief after he failed to move faster to response to the Assad regime’s alleged use of chemical weapons.
“The window to restore our credibility has already closed,” Mr. Grimm said. “I don’t believe the president has the resolve to make this a meaningful strike to really send a message not only to Assad, but to our enemies in Iran as well.”
Mr. Grimm delivered a different message over the weekend, telling the Staten Island Advance that he supported the president’s action.
“He is going to have to strike. He should use our superior air power, our naval power. These should be targeted strikes to disable their air force and where they hold their chemical weapons. The strikes should be at hard targets, like their airfields.”
Mr. Grimm has since changed his tune.
He said Friday that Mr. Obama has stepped back from his 2012 pledge that the use of chemical weapons in Syria would “change my calculus” and that he is not convinced that American troops will not be sent into to nation to secure areas.
“I don’t think the American people have the heart for this at this time,” Mr. Grimm said, adding that the level of danger has increased over the past 72 hours. “There is no easy answer here. I admit that this is a very difficult situation, but I think the president has made it more difficult than it needed to be, and I think he has put us in a difficult situation, and now he is really passing the buck to the Congress.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'economic freedom zones' for Detroit
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- New battlefront emerges in war between Republicans, tea party
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
- Dick Cheney: Family feud over gay marriage has been 'dealt with'
Latest Blog Entries
- Cochran seeks 7th term, sets up another tea party primary battle
- Rep. Jeff Duncan knocks Sen. Harry Reid for handing staff Obamacare exemptions
- Rep. Randy Neugebauer: GOP seeks food stamp savings in farm bill
- Rep. Hakeem Jeffries: Government employee pensions should not be touched in budget talks
- GOP Rep. Mike Rogers warns of security gaps in Obamacare website
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- FENNO: Mike Shanahan's empty words no salve to free-falling Redskins
- Sen. Rand Paul: Supreme Court needs to re-examine Fourth Amendment
- Ezekiel Emanuel: If you want to pay more for your doctor, you can under Obamacare
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Film Reviews and Articles by Kevin Williams
Let it snow
White House pets gone wild!