- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Government OKs Arab-owned company to operate U.S. cargo port
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell’s wife had ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House unveils bill to speed deportations of illegal immigrant children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
Deal on holding guns during abuse cases in doubt
Question of the Day
MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) - A measure to address longstanding concerns that police in Vermont lack space to store guns being held in domestic abuse cases appeared in jeopardy Wednesday as a Senate committee discussed whether the underlying practice is constitutional.
The matter of gun owners’ versus abuse victims’ rights centers on the ability of family court judges to order someone to hand over weapons if they are subject of a relief from abuse order, which does not carry with it the weight of a criminal conviction.
Sen. Joe Benning, R-Caledonia, and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, voiced strong objections, saying for authorities to confiscate guns without a criminal court process violates the U.S. Constitution.
Defendants would be “deprived of their property and they are told they have to pay to get it back, without ever having had a day in court,” Benning said. “I don’t own a gun, but I do care about the Constitution, and when you bypass that, I find that offensive.”
The new objections called into question the apparent agreement between Gov. Peter Shumlin’s administration, domestic violence groups and the sportsmen’s groups that would set up a new fee system to give police the capacity to store weapons.
“I don’t know where it’s going,” Sen. Richard Sears, D-Bennington, who chairs the committee.
But after hearing testimony, especially from gun rights advocates, Sears said it was clear to him that language in a version of the bill that passed the House does not have full agreement.
Vermont family courts that issue relief-from-abuse orders in cases of alleged domestic abuse can do so without the defendant being criminally charged. Frequently a court will order the alleged abuser to surrender any firearms he or she may own, in a bid to keep a volatile and abusive situation from turning deadly. Those weapons are handed over to police or a third party.
“National research in recent years has shown alarming parallels between access to firearms and lethality in domestic violence cases,” said Sarah Kenney, associate director of public policy with the Vermont Network Against Domestic and Sexual Violence.
In Vermont, 56 percent of domestic homicides during the past 18 years were committed with firearms, Kenney said.
Kenney added that the first time a victim seeks a temporary relief from abuse order often triggers the most dangerous time in a relationship, because it is often the first sign to the abuser that the victim may be trying to end it.
“In a study of 230 women killed by their intimate partners, 20 percent of the women who had an active restraining order were killed within two days of receiving it,” she told the committee.
But when a court order results in firearms being turned over to police or sheriffs’ departments, the agencies say, they are left with the challenge of finding secure storage for them, a challenge several law enforcement agencies have said they are not prepared to meet.
A section of a bill on executive branch fees passed by the House would set up a fee schedule of $4 per day per firearm for storage, plus $25 for initial storage and later retrieval, with a maximum yearly cap paid by anyone of $2,000. That cap would otherwise be exceeded if, for example, authorities held two guns for a year. The money would be used to fund storage facilities.
Evan Hughes, vice president of the Vermont Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, said his group did originally support more and better firearms storage “in concept.” But he said its view had changed in light of what he called too-steep fees and because of the constitutional issues.
TWT Video Picks
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- PHILLIPS: Once-in-a-century stupidity
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world