CURL: Obama’s foreign policy — even worse than his domestic policy

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

How bad is President Obama’s foreign policy? So bad he sent Vice President Joseph R. Biden to Kiev to handle the Russia-Ukraine mess.


SEE ALSO: CURL: Shelly O — The first lady comes in last


That’s right, Barack “Red Line” Obama called in the bumbling Mr. Biden, the foreign policy “expert” who once called for Iraq to be partitioned by ethnicity into three countries and opposed President Ronald Reagan’s military build-up that ended the Cold War.

Uncle Joe didn’t disappoint, saying in Kiev: “Thank you for making me feel relevant again.” He, of course, left empty-handed, and perhaps, again, feels irrelevant.

How bad is Mr. Obama’s foreign policy? He’s made Russian President Vladimir Putin look like a bleeding heart humanitarian — stepping in to save the day in Syria by agreeing to accept its chemical weapons, then lecturing the U.S. president on everything from covert surveillance to international law.

Mr. Obama, 52 and a former community organizer from Chicago who likes flip flops and golf, has been over his head from the beginning with Mr. Putin, 61 and a former KGB spook who likes judo and big snarling dogs. Mr. Putin has played him like a fiddle, most recently when he took a phone call from whistleblower Edward Snowden during a press appearance last week.

“We have strict legal regulation of the use of special services of special funds, including wiretaps and surveillance on the Internet,” Mr. Putin said. “So massive, indiscriminate surveillance, in accordance with the law, can not happen.”

Meanwhile, Mr. Obama, battling critics at home over a massive surveillance program that few Americans knew about, has been wildly adrift over what to do with Russia’s incursion into Ukraine. He has talked tough: Just last week he said, “They’re not interested in any kind of military confrontation with us, understanding that our conventional forces are significantly superior to the Russians.”

Not exactly diplomatic talk, and certainly not the way to deal with Mr. Putin. Mr. Obama lacks the nuance necessary to handle dicey international dilemmas, instead drawing “red lines” that box him and his administration into places from which they cannot escape — at least not without extreme embarrassment.

Like Syria. “We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized,” Mr. Obama said in August 2012. “That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.”

Then Syrian President Bashar Assad did all of the above; he redlined all over the place. What did Mr. Obama say? “I didn’t set a red line. The world set a red line.” Nice try.

And guess who was paying close attention? Vladimir Putin. But that didn’t stop Team Obama from drawing another red line in Ukraine. Secretary of State John Kerry, another Senate foreign policy “expert” like Mr. Biden, drew the line earlier this month: “I made clear today that if we are not able to see progress this weekend, then we will have no choice but to impose further costs on Russia.”

That weekend came and went, but nothing happened. Mr. Putin ignored the red line because, well, Mr. Obama ignores red lines.

An actual foreign policy “expert,” Sen. John McCain, who lost to Mr. Obama in the 2008 presidential race, said the very worst thing anyone can ever say about a president: He’s worse than Jimmy Carter.

“I was not a great fan of my fellow Naval Academy graduate, Jimmy Carter. But after the invasion of Afghanistan by Russia, Jimmy Carter — if I may use the words — got religion and got tough,” said the former POW and war hero.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks