- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
Kansas joining compact against federal health law
Question of the Day
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) - Kansas is joining a proposed compact with other states that hope to exempt themselves from the federal health care overhaul, and Republican Gov. Sam Brownback on Wednesday rejected criticism that the move will jeopardize seniors’ benefits.
Brownback announced Wednesday that he quietly signed a compact bill late Tuesday and the new law will take effect July 1. The GOP-dominated Legislature passed the measure earlier this month.
The compact would let participating states remove themselves from federal health regulations if Congress consents. It was prompted by Republicans’ opposition to the 2010 health care law championed by Democratic President Barack Obama. Critics view the overhaul has burdensome, intrusive and damaging to the economy.
“Those closest to the people have the best idea of what the public is wanting and needing,” said state Rep. Brett Hildabrand, a Shawnee Republican pushing the compact measure. “This resets the clock, really.”
The compact language is broad enough to cover Medicaid, which provides health coverage to the needy and disabled, and Medicare, which provides coverage for seniors. It would not cover health care for veterans, active military personnel or Native Americans.
The possibility that member states could seek an exemption from Medicare rules led AARP to lobby against the measure. The organization along with state Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, perhaps the only prominent Kansas Republican to publicly defend the federal health overhaul, urged Brownback to veto the measure, arguing the compact would permit state lawmakers to cut benefits for the 450,000 seniors participating in Medicare.
Praeger said the federal overhaul is helping millions of Americans find affordable health coverage, and she called the new Kansas law “wrongheaded.” Kansas House Minority Leader Paul Davis, a Lawrence Democrat hoping to unseat Brownback in this year’s governor’s race, labeled it “irresponsible” and said Brownback ignored “calls for commonsense leadership.”
“We should not threaten the care of hundreds of thousands of seniors,” Davis said in a statement.
If Congress approved the compact, the federal government would give each state its allotment of federal health care dollars without imposing conditions on how the money is used.
Supporters of the measure said seniors’ benefits aren’t in danger. Many Republicans argued the federal health care overhaul is a far bigger threat to Medicare because it was financed partly with cuts in Medicare payments to providers - mainly hospitals, health insurance companies and drugmakers.
Eight other states, including Missouri and Texas, have enacted similar legislation, according to Competitive Governance Action, the Houston group pushing the idea. The group describes itself on its website as a nonprofit that advocates state control over health care and having problems solved “by the smallest, least centralized, most local authority.”
Curtis Ellis, the group’s spokesman, said AARP has raised questions about potential Medicare cuts in other states and, “It’s a flat-out lie.” But Praeger said ignoring the potential effects on Medicare is “not being honest.”
“The Health Care Compact will allow states to restore and protect Medicare for generations to come,” Brownback said. “Obamacare is the most serious attack on Medicare and seniors since the program’s inception.”
The compact proposal relies on an obscure provision in the U.S. Constitution that requires congressional approval for multistate agreements. It doesn’t give the president a role, making the idea attractive for some critics of the health care overhaul.
TWT Video Picks
By Michael Widlanski
Leveling the battlefield to aid terrorists enables evil to fight on
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Cutler wins endorsement from gun control group
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq