- Number-crunchers put GOP chances of retaking Senate at 60 percent: report
- Ohio sheriff sends bill to Mexico for cost of jailing illegals
- Fla. voters’ support for medical marijuana bodes well for ballot measure: poll
- Keith Urban concert ends in ‘nutso’ chaos, with dozens arrested, injured
- Very religious still lean toward GOP, reflecting long-term patterns, Gallup poll shows
- Fist bump becoming all the rage for germ-wary handshakers
- Tennessee storms ravage counties, wreck 10 homes
- Chinese police tear down church cross in religion crackdown
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: ‘Obama, Obama, where are you?’
- Maine police find wife, husband, 3 children dead in home
Fla. Legislature sends abortion bill to governor
Question of the Day
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) - Women seeking abortions will first be required to have a physician determine if the fetus is viable, defined by Legislation passed Friday as being able to survive with routine medical care.
Current law prohibits abortions after 24 weeks of pregnancy with exceptions including a danger to the life of the mother.
The new bill would outlaw the procedure if viability is determined except in cases to in which the mother’s life is at risk or a procedure is necessary to prevent “a serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function” of a pregnant woman.
It would also remove the exception of psychological trouble as an exception.
The bill and its Senate counterpart were opposed loudly by Democratic lawmakers through the committee process that began in March.
The removal of psychological well-being is “as much a part of the mother’s health as anything,” said Rep. Elaine Schwartz, D-Hollywood.
Another foe, Rep. Michelle Rehwinkel Vasilinda, D-Tallahassee, questioned putting the onus on a doctor to determine the viability of the fetus.
“This is a moving target when you look with the standard of care and when you look at viability,” Rehwinkel Vasilinda said. “It’s difficult for a doctor to pinpoint this.”
Proponents said the measure integrates the 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which found viability as a point at which the life of the fetus outweighs the rights of the woman with the exception of dire consequences to the health of the mother.
The rational was based on medical advancements since the initial determination of viability was stated at 28 weeks by the court in 1973.
The 70-45 House floor vote earlier this month in favor of the bill included four Republicans opposing it.
“This bill is not taking away a woman’s choice,” Flores said in floor debate Friday. “If a woman wants to have an abortion, she can have an abortion. What this bill is saying is that choice needs to be made before the baby is far enough to term to live outside the womb and be viable.”
Flores in 2011 and 2012 introduced measures similar to the bill passed this week. Both failed to move past committees.
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- '50 Shades' movie trailer outrages anti-porn groups
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq