- The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 29, 2014

A federal judge reopened the voter identification debate Tuesday when he struck down a new Wisconsin law, saying it discriminated against blacks and Hispanics, and renewing doubts about the Republican push for stricter voting laws across the country.

Democrats hailed the ruling and said they wanted it expanded to other jurisdictions, but Wisconsin vowed to appeal.

Some legal analysts said Judge Lynn Adelman’s decision appears to contradict a 2008 Supreme Court ruling that upheld a similar law in Indiana.

Judge Adelman said up to 300,000 Wisconsin residents — mostly blacks and Hispanics — could be turned away from polls as a result of the ID requirement. He said his calculation far outnumbered potential fraudulent votes.

“Act 23 has a disproportionate impact on Black and Latino voters because it is more likely to burden those voters with the costs of obtaining a photo ID that they would not otherwise obtain,” the judge wrote in a 90-page opinion that included detailed appendixes laying out his calculations.

“This burden is significant not only because it is likely to deter Blacks and Latinos from voting even if they could obtain IDs without much difficulty, but also because Blacks and Latinos are more likely than whites to have difficulty obtaining IDs,” he wrote.

He said the voter ID legislation, signed by Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican, violated the U.S. Constitution and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibits election laws that disproportionately affect minorities.

State Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen vowed to appeal the ruling.

“I am disappointed with the order and continue to believe Wisconsin’s law is constitutional,” he said in a statement.

Voter ID requirements are part of an increasingly heated debate between the two major political parties, and more than a dozen states have passed stricter laws since 2011.

Republicans say ballot integrity could be compromised without IDs, but Democrats say ballot access is a more pressing issue.

The U.S. Supreme Court last grappled with the issue in 2008, in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board. The justices upheld Indiana’s voter ID requirement in a 6-3 decision.

Half of the majority, however, said states should be left to weigh burdens versus benefits, and the other half, led by Justice John Paul Stevens, said there was no evidence that anyone would be unduly burdened or denied the right to vote by Indiana’s ID requirement.

Judge Adelman said the Wisconsin case is different because in Indiana, the challengers didn’t show any conclusive evidence that people would be denied a chance to vote. In Wisconsin, he said, there was compelling evidence that hundreds of thousands of people — more than enough to sway an election — would be denied a vote.

Rick Esenberg, founder of the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, which filed briefs in the case defending Wisconsin’s law, said Judge Adelman’s decision appears to go against what the Supreme Court held.

Story Continues →