- The Washington Times - Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Iranian fighter jets have begun pounding Islamic State targets, and France said Wednesday that it will ramp up its airstrikes as a U.S.-led coalition met for the first time since the extremists began seizing swaths of Iraq and Syria nearly a year ago.

The Iranian and French developments were welcomed by the Obama administration despite political criticism the White House has faced from both major political parties for relying too heavily on other nations to coordinate the fight against the al Qaeda-inspired militant group.

Iran, which the United States lists as the world’s biggest state sponsor of terrorism, is not an official member of the coalition, but Secretary of State John F. Kerry said its military participation would be a “net positive” in the international push to crush the Islamic State.


PHOTOS: Top 10 U.S. fighter jets


Mr. Kerry and others in the administration adamantly deny any coordination between Washington and Tehran and say the evolving, multilateral war strategy for Syria and Iraq won’t include such cooperation anytime soon.

During comments on the periphery of the coalition meeting in Brussels on Wednesday, Mr. Kerry also downplayed the risk that U.S. and Iranian fighter jets may dangerously cross paths.

“We rely on the Iraqi government to deconflict whatever control of their airspace may in fact need that deconfliction,” he said.


SEE ALSO: Iran using U.S.-made F-4 Phantom jets to bomb Islamic State


Syrian President Bashar Assad — another U.S. adversary whose military is fighting the Islamic State independently of the United States — taunted Western leaders for failing to put together a coherent and effective strategy against the extremists.

In an interview published Wednesday in the French magazine Paris Match, Mr. Assad said the U.S.-led air campaign simply has not rendered “any tangible results” and that measurable success will require significant troops to fight the extremists on the ground.

Mr. Assad seemed to be intentionally inserting himself into a debate that has pitted senior Obama administration officials against one another. Advisers at the Pentagon are believed to be advocating for a U.S. ground troop deployment amid resistance from those inside the White House.

Mr. Kerry appeared to favor the latter view, saying more than 1,000 airstrikes carried out by the U.S.-led coalition against Islamic State targets since September have inflicted serious damage on the group known by the acronyms ISIL and ISIS, and in Arabic as “Daesh.”

The strikes, he said, have opened a window for Iraqi military troops, Sunni tribal fighters and Kurdish militias to advance on the ground.

“It is much harder now than when we started for Daesh to assemble forces in strength, to travel in convoys and to launch concerted attacks,” Mr. Kerry said.

Uncertainty looms over the campaign’s long-term sustainability.

The United States and the rest of the world were slow to act after Islamic State militants claimed control of territory spanning the Syria-Iraq border and seizing Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city, in June. The U.S. and international response was hobbled by confusion and feuding among allies, including what support each nation was willing to give and how to achieve the overarching goal.

Many in the Sunni population blame Washington for propping up an Iranian-backed, Shiite government in Baghdad during the nearly decadelong U.S. military occupation that ended in 2011.

Story Continues →