- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Congress reverses military pension cuts
Votes highlight challenge to curb spending
Congress congratulated itself this week after voting to restore full cost-of-living increases for military retirement benefits — but the bipartisan unity showed just how difficult it will be to tackle the major spending challenges that lie ahead.
Just two months ago, Congress voted in strong bipartisan fashion to cut benefits for younger military retirees as part of the tradeoff for easing some of the ongoing budget sequesters.
But on Tuesday, the House voted 326-90 to restore the benefits, and on Wednesday senators followed in a 95-3 vote.
The reversal was stunningly quick, given that the cuts weren’t slated to kick in until 2015, reducing the cost-of-living adjustment by one percentage point for military retirees under age 62.
“This bill is a step forward but it doesn’t go as far as it should,” said Sen. Bernard Sanders, Vermont independent and chairman of the Veterans' Affairs Committee, who added that while the cuts have been erased for current veterans, those joining the military today will see lower benefits. He said he’s written a bill to boost spending for those future veterans, too.
Lawmakers were being prodded to act by veterans’ groups, who constitute a politically powerful lobby and one that neither side wants to anger, particularly in an election year.
But the fight, over just $6 billion in spending over 10 years, also underscored just how difficult it will be to make bigger changes to government spending, particularly in popular but fiscally unsustainable programs such as Medicare and Social Security.
“If we can’t make this one stick, it’s going to be hard to do the bigger deals,” Rep. Charlie Dent, Pennsylvania Republican, said on MSNBC on Wednesday. Mr. Dent voted for both December’s budget that cut the benefits, and this week’s bill restoring them.
The December budget deal was written by Sen. Patty Murray, the chief Democratic negotiator, and Rep. Paul Ryan, the GOP’s leader on the issue. Ms. Murray voted to undo the military cut, while Mr. Ryan voted to preserve it.
He had argued that it was an important step in getting control of the overall military pension system, which is growing so quickly that it could crowd out basic military spending.
This week’s bill actually reimposes some of the sequester-based cuts in order to restore money for the military benefits.
Joel Friedman, vice president for fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a budget watchdog, said by tapping domestic funds to restore military money, Congress has broken down an informal wall.
“That sends the wrong signal, potentially opening the door to further cuts in domestic programs as a way to shift more money to the Pentagon,” he wrote in a blog posting Wednesday.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- House panel report concludes that Lerner lied to Congress on IRS targeting
- Congress bans taxpayer funding for political conventions
- Intelligence chairwoman accuses CIA of intimidation, snooping on Congress
- CPAC 2014: Poll shows GOP discontent, Congress frustration
- U.S. has lost track of tens of thousands of foreign students who came study to then took jobs
Latest Blog Entries
Jacqueline Klimas covers Capitol Hill for The Washington Times. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- John Brennan eager to put CIA Senate spying issue behind him
- Colorado lawmaker touts need for stoned-driving laws
- Ukraine sanctions package expected in Senate next week
- Sen. Tim Kaine: Climate change discussion already underway
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
Latest Blog Entries
- Miss. GOP chair: Huckabee distracting from GOP's reasonable pro-life stance
- Commerce Secretary 'optimistic' about U.S.'s economic standing worldwide
- Less than half of registered voters would re-elect their congressman, poll finds
- Half of registered voters in Va. would re-elect Sen. Mark Warner
- 2013 was second most polarizing year of Obama's presidency
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- Inside the Beltway: A new interest in Rahm Emanuel for 2016?
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- Brennan: Russia 'absolutely' could invade eastern Ukraine
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Atheists sue to remove 'Ground Zero Cross' from 9/11 museum
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- HURT: John Kerry The ridiculous face of a ridiculous U.S. diplomacy
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again