- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
- Foreign minister vows response if Russians are attacked in Ukraine
- Robert Griffin III to drive pace car before Richmond NASCAR race
EDITORIAL: A rare victory for taxpayers
The court applies a little horse sense to kill an IRS scheme
The president’s stunning proclamation that he will ignore the Constitution’s checks and balances to go it alone puts new pressure on the judiciary. In the tug of war between the three branches of government, it often falls to judges to take the pen out of the hand of an overeager executive.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit did just that Tuesday to foil the Internal Revenue Service’s attempt to regulate kitchen-table tax preparers without authority from Congress to do so.
Over the past hundred years, the annual tax ritual has gone from filling out a relatively straightforward three-page form with a one-page instruction sheet to the stressful struggle on April 15 with a maze of forms, schedules and worksheets.
Instructions now fill several volumes, and the rules are so complex that a cottage industry of small entrepreneurs who have figured out the system hang out a shingle during tax season. It’s an opportunity to make a little money on the side. Neighbors are more than willing to pay someone they know to help them navigate through the confusion.
The big boys in the professional tax-preparation firms, such as H&R Block, were naturally pleased by the White House decree that tax preparers need a license. Large companies can afford to pay the annual fees and send employees to 15 hours of continuing education every year. That’s a significant burden on the part-timer who works only during tax season.
There’s more than a hint of cronyism in the administration’s decision to target tabletop tax preparation. In 2009, the president named Mark Ernst, the former CEO of H&R Block, to be IRS deputy commissioner. Mr. Ernst pushed the rule to eliminate the competition for his former employer.
The IRS argued that its regulatory scheme rests on the Horse Act of 1884, which was adopted to limit fraudulent claims for compensation for horses taken (many were killed) for Union army service in the Civil War. This statute became irrelevant decades before the income tax was adopted.
The three-judge appellate panel applied a little horse sense. “In our judgment,” the court said, “the traditional tools of statutory interpretation — including the statute’s text, history, structure and context — foreclose and render unreasonable the IRS’s interpretation of [the Horse Act] … . The IRS may not unilaterally expand its authority through such an expansive, atextual and ahistorical reading of [the law].”
Some of the beneficiaries of the rule seemed to have been kicked in the head by Old Paint. “Something is out of whack,” says H&R Block’s current CEO, Bill Cobb, “when you are better protected when getting your haircut than when sitting across the desk from a tax preparer.”
Government certification is hardly a guarantee of quality, and cutting hair is not rocket science, either. But every official in the executive branch swears an oath and signs a paper that says he will “support and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
In recent times, such certification hasn’t always been worth the paper it’s printed on. It’s a blessing for all that the Institute for Justice brought this lawsuit to remind the bureaucrats at the IRS to stop horsing around and follow the law.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Downsize bloated National Park Service
- EDITORIAL: Court strikes blow for campus colorblindness on affirmative action
- EDITORIAL: Voting with one's feet shows folly of liberal economic policies
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Pelosi's foot-washing backwash
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: When disobeying orders saves lives
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
Get Breaking Alerts
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- Georgia governor signs bill expanding gun rights
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Harry Reid using tax dollars to fight Koch brothers, La. GOP chair charges
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- Ukraine claims torture by pro-Russian forces on the heels of Biden's stern warning to Moscow
- Professor apologizes after blasting Republicans in class