- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: GOP must change to win
Question of the Day
Even though I disagree with him over the consequences of American drug use, I think Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican, gets it (“Rand Paul: GOP ‘will not win again in my lifetime’ the presidency, absent change,” Web, Feb. 14).
A long-existing and prominent sector of the Republican Party is only comfortable with a minority-party status. These people thrive when the Democrats are in control of the government, but not when the GOP must assertively take control of, and responsibility for, the process of government.
Amplifying the effect of this faction’s predispositions is the fact that an influential and financially active part of the GOP rank-and-file, business professionals, are pragmatists.
As such, they excel at adapting and accommodating in order to get what they want. To them, hard and fast principles are dispensable in the interest of achieving set goals, and usually they can live with the other party being in control.
A good deal must be at stake before principled conservatives can control the direction of the party. In 1980, runaway inflation and aggressive Soviet expansionism discredited the Gerald R. Ford-Henry Kissinger GOP wing, thus opening the way for the 1980 Reagan Revolution.
Right now, the big issue is the Washington establishment-Main Street disconnect. Things are too fluid and amorphous for a sizable enough consensus to form in the GOP.
It’s an environment hostile to real leadership. So it will be interesting to see how things turn out.
CHRISTOPHER J. HOLLINS
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare enrollees faking for freebies
- EDITORIAL: Feds harassing the deliveryman
- EDITORIAL: Poor Hillary, rock-star wannabe
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Investigate airliner downing, but not Benghazi?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Say no to atheist 'chaplains'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
Get Breaking Alerts
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Pro-Russia rebel commander suggests passengers died days before Malaysian flight
- TYRRELL: The birth of a new alignment in the Middle East
- Despite rhetoric, gun prosecutions plummet under Obama