- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Were ‘greens’ behind attack on electric grid?
Question of the Day
The recent op-ed essays “Was attack on San Jose electric-power substation terrorism?” (Web, Feb. 7) and “Protecting the electric grid” (Feb. 13) were disconcerting to say the least.
The Washington Times has done a great public service in bringing the vulnerability of our electric grid to light, and it is appropriate that this matter be studied and efforts be taken to protect critical infrastructure in a way that makes financial sense.
Both pieces vaguely wagged accusatory fingers at Iran and North Korea for the San Jose attack, but I think they may have missed a much more likely culprit or accomplice: homegrown eco-terrorists.
First, writer Peter Vincent Pry’s colorful description of transformers being “sprayed” with AK-47 fire is highly speculative. An AK-47 is indeed a fully automatic machine gun, but there is no way to tell whether the shots were fired from “the favorite assault rifle of rogue states” (which is rarely found and difficult to obtain in the United States) or from any number of other, non-automatic rifles chambered for the same ammunition and readily available to U.S. citizens.
Regardless, this act of terrorism could very well be a violent escalation of the ongoing “green” war on U.S. energy. As noted in Steve Milloy’s 2009 book “Green Hell,” “[B]y making energy scarce, the greens create larger avenues for expanding the government’s power over the individual.”
Nowhere is this sentiment more evident than in California, where this attack took place. It is not much of a leap of logic to suspect complicity of one or more of the radical environmental groups in such an attack, and I hope the FBI is looking into that possibility.
This ought to be a wake-up call to those that support the strategy of hamstringing traditional energy development. The current administration apparently agrees with the “green” agenda, so it remains to be seen if it does anything more than just talk about reducing our vulnerability to future attacks against our power grid.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare enrollees faking for freebies
- EDITORIAL: Feds harassing the deliveryman
- EDITORIAL: Poor Hillary, rock-star wannabe
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Investigate airliner downing, but not Benghazi?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Say no to atheist 'chaplains'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
Get Breaking Alerts
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Tom Petty: 'No one's got Christ more wrong than the Christians'
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes