MILLER: Orange County makes it easier to get gun concealed carry permit to comply with 9th Circuit

Supreme Court may weigh in on right to bear arms

Story Topics

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling last week that San Diego’s restrictive concealed carry permit laws were unconstitutional is already impacting other anti-gun jurisdictions.

A little ways north in California, Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens has decided to comply with the ruling in Peruta v. County of San Diego that said the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms without having to give the government a “good cause.”

Until now, an Orange County county resident had to give a strong reason on the application for a license.

The instructions read: “If the CCW license is desired for self-protection, the protection of others, or for the protection of large sums of money or valuable property, you are required to explain and provide good cause for issuance of the license. For example, has your life or property been threatened or jeopardized?”

The applicant was also required to provide specific dates, times and locations of the incidents along with reports to a law enforcement agency.

Few could get a carry permit under those strict requirements.

Under the new system, a citizen can just cite “self defense” or “personal safety” as reasons for needing a carry license.

Sheriff Hutchens hedged her bets. The police website notes that it may still revert back to the “good cause” requirement if the San Diego decision is withdrawn to rehear en banc by the appeals court, or a stay is issued by the 9th Circuit or the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, San Diego hasn’t budged. The sheriff’s licensing division posted on the website that it is in the process of reviewing the decision and conferring with legal counsel. The department is continuing existing procedures for carry applications.

The 9th Circuit ruling — and the split in circuit courts — will undoubtedly factor into the Supreme Court decision on what other Second Amendment cases it takes in coming years.

The high court is deciding on Friday whether to take up two cases that are backed by the National Rifle Association — which also funded the San Diego case— that could allow for a decision on the allowable limits to the right to bear arms.

The “may issue” states should start scrambling to rewrite their unconstitutional carry laws.

Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times and author of “Emily Gets Her Gun” (Regnery, 2013).

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts