- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Bill would gradually lower liquor taxes
Question of the Day
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Lawmakers introduced on Wednesday a measure that would gradually lower liquor sales taxes from 20.5 percent to 6.5 percent over eight years.
The measure, which is backed by Republican and Democratic lawmakers, is in response to Washingtonians crossing borders to buy cheaper booze in Idaho and Oregon. Last month Idaho regulators reported that Washingtonians boosted the Gem State’s coffers by $10 million.
“We are chasing our consumers out of our state,” said Republican state Sen. Janea Holmquist Newbry, who is sponsoring the bill along with Democratic Sens. Steve Hobbs and Marko Liias.
Backers say lowering taxes would stop those consumers from leaving Washington to buy booze, and the revenue to the state would eventually be at the same levels before privatization.
Washington voters privatized the state’s monopoly on liquor in 2011 after approving a Costco-backed initiative. Since then, many consumers have found liquor to be too expensive. While prices have decreased over the last 24 months, off the shelf liquor prices in 2013 were still significantly higher than pre-privatization prices. For example, average price per liter of liquor in October of 2011, a month before the ballot vote, was $21.61. Two years later that average price was $24.12 - an 11 percent increase, according to data from the Department of Revenue.
The bill is being introduced with only two weeks left in the legislative session, lowering its chances of being considered in both chambers and convincing lawmakers to reduce the state’s bite of revenue from liquor sales.
Holmquist Newbry said that at least the measure can start a “healthy dialogue” on liquor taxes.
According to fiscal impact estimates prepared by state agencies attached to the bill, cutting taxes for booze would cost the state $20 million in the first two years of implementation and more than $46 million two years later. Local governments would also lose about $20 million, according to those estimates.
David Ozgo, an economist for the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, said at the press conference that Washington state pulled in about $300 million in revenue off liquor sales prior to privatization. That figure is now about $500 million, he said, despite the state no longer spending as much money operating the liquor system.
TWT Video Picks
By Scott Pinsker
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Computer glitch caused odd Saturday release of D.C. guns ruling
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq