It is common knowledge that Barack Obama’s presidency is becoming increasingly unpopular. Did you know, though, that much of the criticism is now starting to come from his own supporters?
It’s one thing for President Obama to see his job approval polls slumping into the low 40s and his job disapproval scores climbing to 54 percent, according to the latest Gallup Poll surveys. It’s quite another thing entirely when his longtime allies and most ardent cheerleaders are criticizing the way he has governed, or not governed.
CBS News reported Wednesday that nearly 60 percent of Americans it polled “say they are disappointed” in his presidency. Notably, 40 percent of independents said they were “very disappointed” and a stunning one-fourth of the Democrats that were surveyed “express at least some disappointment.”
You really know that things are going from bad to worse when your friends begin deserting you.
Some of the criticism and distancing is coming from embattled Democrats on Capitol Hill, who are no longer embracing Obamacare the way they used to, or damning it with faint praise. Others are running away from the health care law altogether, and do not want to appear with him out on the campaign trail in what may be shaping up to be a blowout election year for his party.
Even some of his many allies in the major news media have been pounding Mr. Obama for his wimpy, risk-adverse, over-politicized presidency. The complaints range from his failed economic policies to Obamacare to his incompetent handling of foreign affairs.
Washington Post columnist Fred Hiatt took the president to task this week in a column whose headline asked, “What change does Obama believe in?”
Take Social Security’s shaky finances, he says. One of fixes would require a recalculation of its cost-of-living formula, and Mr. Obama spoke boldly in 2009 that “we must also address the growing costs in Medicare and Social Security.”
“I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans,” Mr. Obama said in 2010. Yeah, sure.
Instead of grappling with a thorny problem that now threatens America’s solvency, he has decided “to drop the [COLA] reform from his proposed budget,” Mr. Hiatt said. The decision to back away from his bluff-and-bluster promise, Mr. Hiatt said, raised “a bigger question: What does he believe in enough to really fight for?”
He has said that he “refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action” in Syria, but, as Mr. Hiatt noted, he remains a bystander as Bashar Assad goes about exterminating thousands of his fellow citizens to crush a rebellion against his brutal dictatorship. Syria, Mr. Obama said last September, was “someone else’s war.”
On issue after he issue, he made big promises, only to walk away from one challenge after another.
One of Mr. Obama’s earliest fans and biggest defenders was The Washington Post’s liberal columnist, E.J. Dionne Jr. Now Mr. Dionne is criticizing Mr. Obama for being too timid and offering only small ideas in the face of big problems. “The real issue isn’t that Obama is trying to do too much. It’s that he needs to think bigger,” Mr. Dionne wrote in a recent column.
“One of the disappointments of Obama’s time in office is his failure to lead a thoroughgoing reform in the way the federal government works,” and to “bring fresh talent to its ranks,” he wrote. “Alas, Obama didn’t really try,” he added.
Actually, the president likes big-spending government just the way it is, except he wants to make it bigger, much bigger and much more costly. As for improving the way government works, he has utterly zero interest in it. His botched implementation of Obamacare is Exhibit A.