- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
First lady touts ‘label of the future’ for foods
Having already revamped school lunch menus, first lady Michelle Obama on Thursday again embraced her role as the nation’s top healthy eating advocate and boldly proclaimed that “the label of future” will help consumers pick the right foods.
During an event at the White House to formally announce the Obama administration’s proposed changes to food nutrition labels, the first lady said the listings have become largely ineffective and lack critical details that families need.
“Families deserve more and better information about the food they eat. And it’s important to note that no matter what the final version [of the label] looks like, the new label will allow you to immediately spot calorie count because it will be in very large font and not buried in the fine print,” she said. “You’ll also learn more about whether the sugar in the food comes from, like whether sugar in your yogurt was added during processing or whether it comes from ingredients like fruit. This is what you will get from the label of the future.”
The Food and Drug Administration has put forth two proposed versions of the new label.
Both would include and overhaul of packages’ calorie listings, putting the figures in bigger, easier-to-read font. Both versions also would update serving sizes to better reflect what consumers currently eat and also would list calories, sugar content and other facts for an entire package of food.
The proposal now is in a 90-day public comment period, after which the FDA will finalize the rule. After that, food companies will have two years to comply with the proposal, expected to cost food companies about $2 billion.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Commercial drone use not prohibited by FAA rules, judge says
- In Florida, Obama pushes federal college grants
- CPAC 2014: Democrats target convention as part of midterm-election strategy
- Obama urges Putin in phone call: De-escalate crisis in Ukraine
- Obama slaps Putin with sanctions, restrictions on visas
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Malaysia Airlines says plane on route to Beijing missing
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- SAUERBREY: Taxing Marylanders until they flee
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again