- Tenn. woman receives two-year sentence for stealing $364K meant for homeless veterans
- School bus driver gets probation after kicking autistic girl, 8
- Ex-Army Ranger petitions to keep tan beret off certain soldiers’ heads
- U.S. clears sale of $680 million in Black Hawk helicopters to Mexico
- Justice Dept.’s new clemency guidelines: Crack offenders most obvious candidates
- Kansas man wants ‘Murder’ tattoo removed from neck before murder trial
- Obama goes golfing as family mourns aunt’s death in Boston
- Atheists win prayer battle against California city council
- Americans for Prosperity ad attacks N.H. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen’s Obamacare vote
- Senate races are close in Southern states, poll shows
McDonnell lawyers want specifics on charges
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) - Lawyers for Bob McDonnell said in a federal court filing that they want more details on what exactly federal prosecutors allege the former Virginia governor did wrong.
McDonnell’s defense team complained in the Thursday filing that prosecutors have “employed vague language that obscures what the government claims Mr. McDonnell actually did” in their 14-count indictment of McDonnell and his wife, Maureen. The defense team wants a federal judge to order prosecutors to produce a “bill of particulars,” or a detailed statement of charges.
The McDonnells were charged last month with accepting more than $165,000 in gifts and loans in exchange for helping the chief executive of a health supplement company sell his products.
The crux of the case is whether the McDonnells performed official acts to help former Star Scientific CEO Jonnie Williams or the couple extended routine courtesies, and nothing more, to Williams and his company.
The gifts Williams gave the McDonnells include a Rolex watch, luxury dresses and the use of a Ferrari. When in office, the McDonnells opened up the Executive Mansion for a launch party for a Star Scientific product and arranged for a meeting between Williams and a state health official.
Legal experts have said prosecutors may have difficulty proving the McDonnells abused their official positions in a legal sense, noting that is a fine line between what is illegal versus what is unseemly.
The defense team said in its motion that the lack of specificity used by prosecutors in the indictment speaks to that difficulty.
“The government almost certainly deployed such loose language in order to plead around the stubborn reality that Mr. McDonnell neither promised nor performed any legally cognizable official act at any time,” the lawyers said in the motion.
The defense team also points out that the indictment alleges that the McDonnells conspired with others, “both known and unknown to the grand jury,” to commit their crimes. The defense lawyers want prosecutors to provide the names of those individuals.
Without a bill of particulars, McDonnell’s legal team argued, it will be difficult to prepare adequately for the July trial.
As of early afternoon noon Friday, prosecutors had not filed a response.
TWT Video Picks
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- IRS revokes conservative group's tax-exempt status over anti-Clinton statements: report
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Ministry of Truth: SCOTUS skeptical of law to police campaign 'lies'
- EDITORIAL: Voting with one's feet shows folly of liberal economic policies
- Ukraine claims torture by pro-Russian forces on the heels of Biden's stern warning to Moscow
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014