RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) - North Carolina regulators issued notice to Duke Energy on Friday that the company will be cited for violating environmental standards in connection with a massive coal ash spill that coated 70 miles of the Dan River with toxic sludge.
Two formal notices issued by the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources cite Duke for separate violations of wastewater and stormwater regulations. The agency could levy fines against Duke for the violations, but the amounts have not yet been determined.
The spill began Feb. 2 when an old stormwater pipe running under a 27-acre coal ash dump at a Duke’s Dan River Steam Station in Eden collapsed. It took the company nearly a week to fully plug the leak.
State environmental Sec. John Skvarla, whose agency has been widely criticized in the wake of the spill, issued a brief statement: “These are violations of state and federal law, and we are holding the utility accountable.”
The violation notices were issued three days after The Associated Press filed a public records request for a copy of Duke’s stormwater permit for the Dan River plant, which the company was required to have to legally discharge rainwater draining from its property into the river.
Such a permit may have required testing and inspections that could have given early warning something was wrong before the collapse.
The agency responded that no such permit existed.
In a written statement, spokeswoman Bridget Munger said the state had historically considered the stormwater pipes at the plant to be part of the facility’s wastewater permit covering discharges from the ash basins. State regulators had been talking with Duke since 2011 for the company to apply for the required stormwater permit, but that issue had not been resolved by the time of the spill, she said.
“Staff members in the department’s stormwater permitting unit have been working since that time with Duke Energy to develop a template for individual stormwater permits for all of their facilities that have coal ash ponds,” Munger said Wednesday. “Some progress has been made but there are still many issues to be resolved, including monitoring, parameters for testing and other requirements.”
Asked directly whether Duke was in violation of state and federal laws for not having the required stormwater permits, the agency refused to answer. It is not clear why the agency had not issued Duke notice it was in violation during the years before the spill.
After issuing a news release about the violations at 5 p.m. on Friday, agency communications director Drew Elliot said his staff had been too busy in recent days to respond to the AP’s question. He said the final decision to issue the violations was not made until Friday morning.
Frank Holleman, a senior attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, expressed dismay that the state regulators had knowingly allowed Duke to operate without the required permit for years.
“It is unbelievable that Duke would knowingly have discharges from these stormwater pipes without a permit and that DENR would allow them to do it,” Holleman said. “Someone needs to explain why this happened.”
The second violation notice issued Friday was for failing to prevent the massive spill and exceeding state water-quality standards in the river, which tests showed had high levels of arsenic, lead and aluminum - metals contained in coal ash. Public health officials have advised people to avoid contact with the river water and to not eat fish.
The notices of violation invite Duke to respond within 15 and 30 days with any information on why the company should not be issued fines.