- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Ky. Senate passes abortion bill
Question of the Day
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) - The Kentucky Senate voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to require doctors to perform ultrasounds prior to abortions and to describe what is seen to the pregnant women.
Doctors failing to comply would face fines of up to $100,000 for a first offense and up to $250,000 for subsequent violations. The requirement would be added to Kentucky’s existing informed-consent law.
“It’s a life,” said Republican Sen. Whitney Westerfield of Hopkinsville, the bill’s lead sponsor. “And if ever we’re going to have all the information to make that best decision, this is the time to do that.”
Sen. Reginald Thomas, D-Lexington, said the bill reflected a “Scarlet Letter mentality” toward women.
“We don’t have to have face-to-face meetings, we don’t have to have ultrasounds … to understand what it means to be pregnant,” he said. “And what this bill does is try to deny a woman’s constitutional right to have control over her own health-care decisions.”
Senators voted 33-5 to send the measure to the House, where similar proposals have died in past years.
Asked later if he thinks the outcome might be different this time, Westerfield told reporters: “I’ve asked for people to pray to soften the hearts of those in the leadership in the House and the chairman of whichever committee it gets assigned to.”
The measure would require a doctor performing an ultrasound to provide a “simultaneous explanation” of what is seen, including the location of the fetus in the uterus.
The ultrasound images would be displayed so the pregnant woman could view them. But she could choose to avert her eyes from the images without risk of penalty to the woman or the doctor.
Last month, the Senate passed another proposed update to the state’s informed-consent law that would require face-to-face meetings between medical professionals and women seeking abortions. It would require women to receive the information and then wait at least 24 hours before having an abortion.
The bill’s supporters say abortion providers have circumvented the law’s intent by providing the information through recorded telephone messages. The bill has been referred to a House committee.
The ultrasound legislation is Senate Bill 8. The legislation requiring face-to-face meetings is Senate Bill 3.
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- Afghan who killed three U.S. Marines in 2012 to serve over 7-year prison sentence
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq