You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

EDITORIAL: Bailing out Obamacare

Congressional inquiry finds no legality for payout to insurers

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

You don't need a degree in higher math to see that the numbers for President Obama's health care takeover don't add up. Obamacare doles out generous subsidies to the elderly in the expectation that healthy young people will pay higher premiums to cover the added costs of insuring the old.

The millennials, to Mr. Obama's surprise and sorrow, aren't as credulous as he thought they would be. They haven't signed up for Obamacare in appreciable numbers. So he's preparing a bailout, and what he has in mind may be against the law.

Tucked inside the thousand-page Obamacare legislation are provisions guaranteeing profits for insurance companies to entice them to play the government's game. If insurance firms join the exchanges and pay out more in medical claims than they anticipate, taxpayers would cover their losses.

The administration expected 40 percent of adult enrollees to be under age 35, but so far only 24 percent fit that crucial demographic. A scheme known as "risk corridors" would be used to pay back the private insurance companies for losses plus a 3 percent profit. With the prospect of "free" government cash, reimbursement requests will soon flood the bureaucracy.

When congressional inquisitors asked Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of Health and Human Services, in December how much this would cost, she simply shrugged. "We won't know anything about what that risk corridor looks like until we get more enrollment," she said. Since it never bothered to get an estimate, the administration intends to write a blank check.

A new report by the Congressional Research Service says the White House can't do that. A bailout for insurers requires action by Congress, in an explicit appropriation of funds.

"Statutory and constitutional provisions," the congressional analysts found, "prohibit federal agencies from making payments in the absence of a valid appropriation. Under longstanding [Government Accountability Office] interpretations, an appropriation must consist of both a direction to pay and a specified source of funds."

There has been no such appropriation for "the risk corridor" program. Mr. Obama thinks he has the pen to sign as many checks as he needs to keep his health care scheme afloat.

The White House knows it can't take hat in hand to Congress to ask for a proper appropriation. Only a handful of Obamacare diehards would go on record this election year to authorize a billion-dollar giveaway to the insurance men, who are held in barely higher esteem than a congressman (or a journalist).

House Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton requested the legal analysis to rally support to force the president to obey the law. "This memo raises serious questions on the legality of the administration's plan," he says, "just the latest in a pattern of unilateral delays and actions outside the bounds of the law. We must protect taxpayer dollars even as the administration rushes to cover up its failures in implementing the health law."

If Congress, once so jealous of its constitutional prerogatives, allows the president to get away with taking unconstitutional control of the nation's purse strings, Congress will render itself irrelevant.

Mr. Obama will use his pen to spend whatever he thinks he can get away with. Congress must send the executive and his advisers to a class in remedial arithmetic.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts