- ‘I Am Alive’ app gains popularity in terror-ravaged Lebanon
- Gun giveaways gain popularity among Republican candidates
- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
- Iranian woman forgives son’s killer at the gallows
- Nebraska principal sorry for ‘don’t tattle’ flier
- Illinois readies to spend $100M for Obama museum in Chicago
- John Edwards back in court — this time as a lawyer for Va. boy’s malpractice case
- Covered California reports more than 200K in overtime Obamacare sign-ups
- Thanks, Chuck: Hagel says U.S. sending Ukraine sleeping mats, helmets
HENTOFF: How we will be a self-governing republic again
Can anything wake up the press to its role as defender of the Constitution?
Years ago, while interviewing Supreme CourtJustice William Brennan for my book “Living the Bill of Rights,” I learned a lifelong lesson as a citizen and reporter, while asking him a sort of schoolboy question:
“What’s your favorite part of the Bill of Rights?”
His instant answer: “The First Amendment, from which all of our liberties flow.”
So it is when the media, in its various forms — from print to digital — are alert to government disabling of our individual constitutional liberties, we awaken to becoming a free people again.
A current example is what’s happening to the presidential prospects of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who had been anointed by the media as a boldly promising prospect for the 2016 elections until the state and national media — deeply questioning the constitutionality of his current leadership — did a penetrating First Amendment job on him.
However, too much of the time, during the Bush-Cheney administration, and even worse, during the Constitution-disintegrating Obama administration’s reign, the press has refused to be what used to be called the “Fourth Estate.”
That is, the press keeps monitoring the other three branches of our government on the faithfulness of their protection of our freedoms and the rest of our identity as a truly free people, whom the government serves rather than spies upon. It also guards the right of each citizen to the protection of the First Amendment, in violation of which President Obama allows the secret tracking of reporters’ phone calls and Internet messages.
A current, particularly egregious case of the media not fulfilling its Fourth Estate role is its loss of interest in one of the most un-American violations of the separation of powers when Mr. Obama signed into law for fiscal 2012 the National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the military — without going to court — to detain and imprison anyone, including American citizens right here, who are suspected of involvement in terrorism.
As the American Civil Liberties Union points out, “The law does not require even an allegation that a detained person caused any harm or threat of harm to the United States or to any U.S. interest. Mere allegation of membership or support (otherwise undefined) of an alleged terrorist group could be the basis for indefinite detention.
“Under the American justice system, we don’t just lock people up indefinitely based on suspicion,” wrote the ACLU in response to the 2012 National Defense Authorization act on Feb. 22, 2012.
Nor have I seen any sustained concern — in print or digital media — that, as of this writing, the Supreme Court has yet to agree to review the National Defense Authorization Act. Not that I am filled with confidence that this ultimate protector of our rule of law will begin to bring us back to being Americans. But the high court’s involvement might somewhat awaken the press and the citizenry.
When I was out of college deciding what to do with the rest of my life, reading James Madison prodded me to become a reporter. Madison wrote:
“To the press alone, chequered as it is with abuses, the world is indebted for all the triumphs which have been gained by reason and humanity over error and oppression … to the same beneficent source the United States owes much of the lights which conducted them to the ranks of a free and independent nation.” So what would Madison and Thomas Jefferson — and Patrick Henry, so wary of federal executive power — think of the National Defense Authorization Act?
“In the Virginia Resolutions of 1798, Madison wrote that ‘in case of a deliberate, palpable and dangerous exercise of power by the federal government, states have the right and are in duty bound to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil,’” wrote the Tenth Amendment Center on Jan. 10.
A few states are trying to do just that. Have you heard much about it? How much do your kids know about the National Defense Authorization Act when so few schools teach American history — let alone the dramatic history of how we often got the Constitution to protect us from our government?
TWT Video Picks
By Joy Overbeck
Redemption by government is futile
Get Breaking Alerts
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- Obama taunts GOP, takes nationally televised victory lap on Obamacare
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Probe Boston teen's medical, custody case
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support a modern-day Tiananmen protest
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: An honorable president would resign
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable