- Mexican train carrying 1,300 migrants headed toward U.S. derails
- Secret Service begins regular K-9 patrols around White House
- Pentagon’s human memory-chip program moves forward
- Obama blasts GOP, ignores immigration crisis in Texas speech
- Marine Warfighting Lab tests the Godzilla of amphibious assault vehicles
- Harry Reid: Birth-control ruling the worst Supreme Court decision in 25 years
- Vet suicides ‘horrible human cost’ of VA dysfunction: lawmaker
- First marijuana customer in Spokane says he was fired
- Hagel: ‘Make no mistake,’ ISIL is an ‘imminent’ threat to U.S.
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to ‘fight for national sovereignty’
Light saver: Spending bill throws lifeline to incandescent bulbs
Question of the Day
Thrown in the mix of the $1.1 trillion spending bill that passed the House on Wednesday is a nod to incandescent bulb lovers — language that prohibits funding for the burdensome light bulb standard that, in effect, banned a couple of the more popular wattage products from store shelves.
On Jan. 1, White House-backed new standards for incandescent bulbs went into effect, mandating that the 40-watt bulbs could only draw 10.5 watts of energy and the 60-watt bulb, only 11 watts of energy. The mandate had the effect of banning sales of these two wattages of bulbs and forcing consumers to buy the much more expensive compact fluorescents or LED lights.
But the incandescent bulbs may have new life.
The spending bill includes text that bans funding for what Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers called in Fox News "the administration's onerous 'light bulb' standard."
The pertinent section of the bill, 322, stated: "None of the funds made available in this Act may be used ... to implement or enforce the standards established by [certain tables] ... of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act."
Still, manufacturers may put incandescent bulbs out of business, some environmental insiders say.
"The market has marched forward despite this rider," said Franz Matzner, associate director of government affairs at the Natural Resources Defense Council, in the Fox News report. "The manufacturers have all been saying — we're going to comply anyway."
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Chumley is a continuous news writer for The Washington Times. Previously, she was part of the start-up team for The Washington Times’ digital aggregation product, Times247. She’s also a 2008-2009 Robert Novak journalism fellow with The Phillips Foundation. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Iraq tells U.N. that 'terrorist groups' have seized nuclear materials
- Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl captured in photo smiling with Taliban jihadist
- John Wayne's heirs sue Duke University for 'Duke' bourbon rights
- San Francisco Giants mull dress code for fans after headdress fiasco
- House side of Capitol temporarily closes for asbestos incident
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Ken Allard
Only the National Guard can re-establish homeland security
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- HUSAIN: The fake caliph of 'The Islamic State'
- IRS employee suspended for pro-Obama activities
- Va. Democrat reportedly seeks nude shots of Kendall Jones
- Amid border crisis, Obama to take 15-day vacation in Martha's Vineyard
- ISTOOK: Flying illegals home would be 99.5 percent cheaper than Obamas plan
- HUSAR: Mexicos Pena Nieto passes the immigration bucket
- Illegal immigrants showing up at border with 'Yes we can' Obama shoes: report
- GOP: Lerner warned IRS employees to hide information from Congress
- Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi denied freedom by Mexican judge
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs
U.S.-Ghana World Cup opener