- Israel flattens home of top Hamas leader, takes out power plant
- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Failure of ostrich approach to foreign policy
Question of the Day
Since the world has often been a dangerous place, America’s military and foreign aid are widespread around the globe. Some politicians decry the role of America as the policeman of the world. However, there is much to consider in the current abandonment of American influence, especially in the Middle East and Far East.
Prior to Barack Obama’s presidency, the last time the United States shrank from being the world’s cop was during the isolationist period of the 1930s. It certainly did not work out so well. We, England and France should have stopped Hitler at any of the following points: when he increased his military, sent his soldiers into the Rhineland, took over Austria, took control of the Sudetenland at the Munich Conference, grabbed the rest of Czechoslovakia or repeatedly violated German military restrictions imposed by the Versailles Treaty.
With regard to the Japanese imperialism before World War II, we should have stopped Tojo when he took over Manchuria, invaded China, and permitted or started the “Rape of Nanking,” including the actual bombing of an American warship in the Yangtze River. With regard to the Italian imperialism before World War II, we should have stopped Mussolini when he invaded Albania, devastated Ethiopia and began a war with Greece.
The utilization of American influence can include military action, but the use of our armed forces should be used very wisely. For example, instances in the Vietnam War where our armed forces captured a jungle mountain or hilltop only to abandon it soon after demonstrated a lack of strategic vision. American influence should carefully and prudently focus on the issues and a larger strategic vision. The blood of American service personnel is extremely precious.
When an ostrich puts its head in the sand, the danger does not automatically go away; it generally remains. “Leading from behind” may provide some short-term benefits, but it will more likely be more costly, more dangerous and more bloody in the long run.
East Windsor, N.J.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- EPSTEIN: All IRS roads lead to the archivist
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- PRUDEN: When the hangman botches the job