- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Failure of ostrich approach to foreign policy
Since the world has often been a dangerous place, America’s military and foreign aid are widespread around the globe. Some politicians decry the role of America as the policeman of the world. However, there is much to consider in the current abandonment of American influence, especially in the Middle East and Far East.
Prior to Barack Obama’s presidency, the last time the United States shrank from being the world’s cop was during the isolationist period of the 1930s. It certainly did not work out so well. We, England and France should have stopped Hitler at any of the following points: when he increased his military, sent his soldiers into the Rhineland, took over Austria, took control of the Sudetenland at the Munich Conference, grabbed the rest of Czechoslovakia or repeatedly violated German military restrictions imposed by the Versailles Treaty.
With regard to the Japanese imperialism before World War II, we should have stopped Tojo when he took over Manchuria, invaded China, and permitted or started the “Rape of Nanking,” including the actual bombing of an American warship in the Yangtze River. With regard to the Italian imperialism before World War II, we should have stopped Mussolini when he invaded Albania, devastated Ethiopia and began a war with Greece.
The utilization of American influence can include military action, but the use of our armed forces should be used very wisely. For example, instances in the Vietnam War where our armed forces captured a jungle mountain or hilltop only to abandon it soon after demonstrated a lack of strategic vision. American influence should carefully and prudently focus on the issues and a larger strategic vision. The blood of American service personnel is extremely precious.
When an ostrich puts its head in the sand, the danger does not automatically go away; it generally remains. “Leading from behind” may provide some short-term benefits, but it will more likely be more costly, more dangerous and more bloody in the long run.
East Windsor, N.J.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Russian fighter jet buzzes U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year