- Associated Press - Thursday, January 23, 2014

PARK CITY, Utah (AP) - James “Whitey” Bulger speaks.

Though the 84-year-old former crime boss declined to take the stand at the summer 2013 trial where he was convicted of multiple counts of murder and extortion, he can be heard defending himself in a new documentary playing at the Sundance Film Festival.

Bulger is perhaps the most compelling voice in Joe Berlinger’s film “Whitey: United States of America v. James J. Bulger,” which also includes interviews with prosecutors, defense attorneys, journalists and victims’ relatives.

“The most exciting thing about this film is it’s the first time we actually hear Whitey Bulger,” the director said in an interview. “And it will probably be the last time, because he is now in the custody of the federal government, which has deemed Whitey off limits for interviews.”

In the film, Bulger tells his defense attorney that he was never an FBI informant, but rather had federal agents on his payroll, paying up to $50,000 in cash for information, wiretaps and photo surveillance.

“Money is the common denominator,” Bulger tells his attorney, J.W. Carney, Jr., in a phone conversation. “Organized crime people cannot exist without contacts, and these people know it… Everybody can be corrupted.”

Bulger was just as vehement in his denial about being an FBI informant - an issue critical to Berlinger’s film, if not Bulger’s criminal trial.

“I never, never, never cracked,” Bulger says, describing an instance where he was sentenced to solitary confinement for four months for refusing to give up the name of a guard who’d smuggled him some blades during a failed escape plot. “And the Boston FBI? No way.”

Bulger asserts: “We’re payin’, we’re not sayin’. We’re buyin’, we’re not sellin’.”

Berlinger explores the defense team’s allegations that Bulger was not an informant and suggests “there’s a much deeper conspiracy and cover up that’s going on.”

“There are important questions of government corruption in the Whitey Bulger case that need to be addressed,” the Oscar- and Emmy-nominated director said.

The film shows how Bulger’s name was used to get search warrants in various cases that led to the arrests and convictions of mafia members. If Bulger wasn’t an informant, those warrants would have been deceptively secured, meaning the convictions could be overturned and the government could be liable.

Bulger says he was “shocked” when he learned his longtime contact, disgraced former FBI Special Agent John Connolly, kept an informant file on him. The film suggests the file may have been fabricated.

“I consider it the worst betrayal that ever happened to me in my life,” Bulger says. “I was the guy who did the directing. He didn’t direct me.”

Berlinger maintains that the film is not an apology for Bulger.

Story Continues →