- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Herring derelict on duty to defend state law
Question of the Day
Virginia Attorney General Mark R. Herring has abandoned his client (“VA’s top law official won’t enforce voter-approved gay-marriage ban,” Web, Jan. 23). The people of Virginia hired Mr. Herring to be their lawyer, to provide them with good counsel and to represent them to the best of his ability. However, Mr. Herring has decided that his views and wishes take precedence over those of his clients.
Now the issue becomes one of the morality of the legal profession and the sincerity of the Virginia Bar Association in ensuring the professionalism of those practicing law in the commonwealth of Virginia. It is the association’s duty to protect those seeking legal help from charlatans and incompetents. How many times have we heard from the legal profession that everyone is entitled to a defense even though the attorney knew the guilt of the client? How many times have we heard that it is the courts that decide issues of conflict and law between parties? However, is it not the responsibility of the Virginia Supreme Court — and, ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court — to determine constitutionality?
Mr. Herring’s decision not to defend the Virginia Constitution is no less a violation of everything we have been told and believe about an attorney’s responsibility toward his client than a lawyer who sat silent as his client was tried in court. Failure to defend a client in that case would certainly be deemed misconduct or incompetence, and everyone would expect the relevant bar association to take action against that lawyer.
So is the Virginia Bar Association going to be a potted plant and sit by while a lawyer under its jurisdiction publicly and blatantly violates his oath not only to his client, the people of Virginia, but also to his responsibilities to his profession?
If Mr. Herring personally has a problem defending the Constitution of Virginia, he should resign or at the very least assign another lawyer in his office to the job. The way in which the Virginia Bar Association reacts will give us a real look at the legal profession. Is the association what it professes to be — or are we just being fed a lot of propaganda?
ROBERT A. POGGI
About the Author
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for some policy 'pars' from golfer-in-chief
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Texas law is making women safer
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Redskins partnership is a win-win
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: No taxpayer funds for illegals
- EDITORIAL: The two faces of Mark Warner
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- EPSTEIN: All IRS roads lead to the archivist
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Inside the Beltway: Republican posse rides out to fire Harry Reid
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- KUHNER: Will Russia-Ukraine be Europe's next war?