- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
Nebraska high court reverses order for new trial
Question of the Day
LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) - The Nebraska Supreme Court has reversed a lower court’s order for a new trial for a Grand Island man convicted of drug charges.
The state’s Court of Appeals reversed Roger Dalland’s meth conviction and granted him a new trial in June. The court ruled that a police officer who said he smelled marijuana on Dalland inside a police station violated Dalland’s constitutional rights when he searched Dalland’s car outside.
The ruling came down Friday, the Lincoln Journal Star reported (http://bit.ly/1ayisZi ).
The case stems from Dalland’s 2011 conviction on a count of possession of methamphetamine. Dalland had been called to the station in Aurora for questioning in another case. Once at the station, an Aurora police officer said he smelled marijuana on Dalland, then the officer later followed Dalland to his car. The officer searched Dalland and his vehicle, finding three syringes containing trace amounts of meth.
Dalland was sentenced last summer to 270 days in jail. He served about 150 days.
Dalland appealed, raising the question of whether the odor of marijuana on a person inside a building gives police probable cause to search that person’s vehicle once he enters it.
The appeals court found that it did not. The lower court also said the officer’s testimony didn’t match what he said in the affidavit for Dalland’s arrest, but the state Supreme Court said the court should have given deference to the district court judge who heard the case.
Information from: Lincoln Journal Star, http://www.journalstar.com
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq