LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Fewer wealthy wouldn’t mean less poverty

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

For more than five years, our president has failed to ignite economic growth with his spending, regulating and taxing policies. Initially, he and his lemmings were able to blame President George W. Bush and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

However, all the while the current administration has been turning down the drivers of economic growth with excessive financial and environmental regulations, and the passage of Obamacare. The result has been a stagnant economy, chronic unemployment, the lowest labor-force participation rate in 40 years and a country drowning in debt.

Not to worry, though. Democrats and the big-government crowd have a new mantra. Having failed to convince the public that social justice and universal health care were the policies to save America, they will attempt to distract and deceive us into believing that income and wealth inequality are at the root of all of America’s problems.

I can hardly wait for President Obama to tell us how unfair it is that the richest 85 people in the world control as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion people. What he won’t tell us is that there is no relationship between the two groups.

Wealth is not a zero-sum game; if the top 85 lost their wealth, the 3.5 billion would very likely remain poor. Wealth is created, which means that large numbers of the 3.5 billion could exit poverty without the top 85 becoming less wealthy.

Nor will Mr. Obama tell us that most (if not all) of these 85 created their wealth via free enterprise while simultaneously creating millions of jobs and income for millions of people. Can anyone say that Bill Gates, Warren Buffett or others in the top 85 have stymied economic growth? No.

Unfortunately, our president will not seek the creation of wealth by unburdening the free-enterprise system. Instead, he will ask for confiscation of wealth for redistribution through Obamacare and public-assistance programs.

MIKE FERREER

Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts