- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
EDITORIAL: A flash of truth on speed-camera cash
Municipal revenue schemes begin to unravel
Question of the Day
The Baltimore Sun reports some interesting statistics about the revenue cameras that have been harassing drivers passing through Charm City for years. One of every 10 speeding tickets records a speed reading that’s completely made up.
Grandmas in 20-year-old bangers are accused of daredevil speed. Parked cars are cited for speeding. A limousine innocent of everything but luxury is cited for running a nonexistent red light. About 70,000 motorists have been shaken down so far. Charming.
Instead of returning the stolen money with a humble apology, Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake goes after the mechanical messenger. She says URS Corp., which conducted the secret audit commissioned by the city, was not “sufficiently qualified” to test the robotic cameras.
URS Corp. is a publicly traded engineering firm worth nearly $4 billion, so it’s not likely to fly by night (or day, either). It’s certainly qualified to do the basic arithmetic required to verify the speed readings on a photograph, with simple time and distance calculations. Mayor Rawlings-Blake sounds like she’s furious that the company didn’t find and present the data in the way such companies are expected to do. It’s all about revenue.
When representatives from the city of Newport News, Va., testified to a Virginia House Transportation subcommittee on Wednesday, they had such figures in hand to present against legislation that would ban the revenue cameras.
The city claims accident reductions of between 19 percent and 98 percent at the three intersections where Redflex Traffic Systems, a for-profit corporation, issues citations.
This “analysis” was disputed by Joe Bahen, a licensed civil engineer who was there to testify for imposing the ban on behalf of the National Motorists Association. He obtained the raw crash data from the city, which he says reveals that accidents with injuries actually increased from 17 percent to 50 percent where cameras were used. Mr. Bahen asked the city to retract its questionable claims to the General Assembly.
But admitting the revenue cameras cause accidents and injuries is not likely. The revenue is important. Besides, it’s old news.
The Virginia Department of Transportation reported in 2007 that these cameras create a safety hazard by encouraging panic braking by motorists to avoid tickets. “The cameras were associated with an increase in total crashes,” the report concluded. The damage varied from intersection to intersection, but the average increase was 29 percent.
The temptation to pad their own pockets with the revenue from the cameras is more than some mayors and aldermen can resist. The Chicago Tribune reports that Aaron M. Rosenberg, former executive vice president at Redflex, admits that Redflex incurred “lavish entertainment expenses with elected officials, consultants and city officials in … efforts to secure new contracts and maintain company revenue.”
The city of Chicago, which ought to know a bribe when it sees one, is investigating for evidence of bribery.
Mr. Rosenberg says such favors have been doled out in a dozen states, including Virginia. Predictably, every town in Virginia that has a contract with Redflex says it has checked, and there’s nothing to report. This recalls the movie “Casablanca,” and Capt. Renault’s “shock, shock” to learn that gambling was going on in the casino.
But enough might be enough, in Virginia. The General Assembly will consider the camera ban soon; the legislation cleared the subcommittee this week. Maryland isn’t likely to follow, but it should confirm the accuracy of the revenue cameras in every jurisdiction statewide.
The people the elected officials serve deserve that much. If they won’t get the audit, it’s only fair to ask: What are they hiding?
About the Author
- Take a first look at The Washington Times' new dynamic website
- 'Standing by Israel' special report
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ventura's court win is really a loss
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ukraine is not so easily understood
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reagan didn't deregulate airlines
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Isaac Orr
New carbon-dioxide rules would put America in the dark
Get Breaking Alerts
- House GOP resurrects border bill, predicts successful Friday vote
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- Pentagon wants extra $19M to equip, train Ukrainian troops
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for some policy 'pars' from golfer-in-chief
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reject any legislation dubbed 'comprehensive'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Stop silence on relocations of illegal aliens
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Atheists, let up on 9/11 cross
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ukraine is not so easily understood