MEER AND SMITH: The economic and political mischief of minimum-wage laws

Executive fiats that raise salaries also cost jobs

Story Topics
Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Wouldn’t it be great if our nation’s leaders really could just wave a magic wand and raise workers’ wages? With bigger paychecks for the same work, those who earn the least in the labor market would be able to afford more and their quality of lives would drastically improve. “Poof” — problem solved.

President Obama would like to do just that. In his State of the Union address Tuesday night, he asked Congress to raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10.

Can regulation really improve worker welfare so easily, though? Do businesses just need a not-so-gentle nudge to improve the lives of those caught at the bottom of the income scale? Does water really run uphill?

Despite the faddish calls for wage controls, the fundamentals of economics don’t change just because public opinion does. Wages are not arbitrary, but reflect the reality of the labor’s worth to employers and consumers alike.

Policies that distort reality, such as increasing the minimum wage, have repercussions, and in this case, hurt the very people they are trying to help.

First, it is important to understand who these minimum-wage earners are and some basic statistics about the group’s makeup:

Only about 3 percent of the workforce is paid the minimum wage, and less than one-half of 1 percent of minimum-wage earners are heads of households with children.

About a quarter of minimum-wage earners are in high school or college.

Around 60 percent of minimum-wage earners who remain in the workforce are paid more than that within a year. In other words, after gaining basic work experience, their wages go up.

Minimum-wage earners are a minor percentage of the workforce and are primarily composed of young, unskilled workers who do not have dependents. Furthermore, they rapidly move out of the minimum-wage category.

These facts are critical to understanding the value of minimum-wage jobs and the damage raising the minimum-wage inflicts on individuals and on the economy in general.

One of us (Jonathan Meer) led a recent study, “Effects of the Minimum Wage on Employment Dynamics,” which examined the effects of wage controls on job growth. The findings are critical to consider in evaluating policies that intervene in the labor market.

The study reveals that a 10 percent increase to the minimum wage reduces the rate of job growth by approximately one-quarter in the first year following implementation. The president’s call to raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 — a 40 percent increase — would no doubt have devastating effects on job growth.

A great number of the jobs that would have been created would never even come into existence. Far from a win-win, there seems to be an awful lot of losers in this situation.

The result would not simply be that people are fired, it’s that they would never be hired in the first place. While old jobs do not necessarily cease, new jobs are never created.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts