- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
EDITORIAL: Overruling the courts
The tax-cutters get creative in ‘the other Washington’
Question of the Day
When the legislature enacts bad laws or a court decides a case the wrong way, some people get angry. They grumble and complain, venting on the Internet or in a telephone call or two. Others, like Tim Eyman in the state of Washington, do something about it.
For 16 years, Mr. Eyman and his group, Voters Want More Choices, have bedeviled politicians in the state capital at Olympia with tax-limitation proposals, and several of them have been enacted in one of the most liberal of the states. Five times, the public has been asked whether state legislators should be enabled to raise taxes only with a two-thirds vote of both houses of the Legislature, and five times the public has agreed, each time by a wider margin than the last. In 2012, the initiative passed with 64 percent of the vote.
For this, Mr. Eyman’s likeness appears in “Wanted” posters in the lobby of every liberal activist group in the state, because he’s cutting off their access to other people’s money. He calculates his initiatives have saved residents $26 billion so far. Last February, when the Washington Supreme Court declared tax-limitation initiatives unconstitutional, a collective sigh of relief raised the Capitol dome by two full inches. The Northwest Progressive Institute cheered online: “Oh, happy day!”
The high court majority said the only way a voter initiative could impose a supermajority requirement for passing tax bills would be through a constitutional amendment. Otherwise, “a simple majority of the people or the legislature,” the court majority reasoned, “could require particular bills to receive 90 percent approval rather than just two-thirds approval, thus essentially ensuring that those types of bills would never pass. Such a result is antithetical to the notion of a functioning government and should be rejected as such.”
Since only the Legislature can put a constitutional amendment on the ballot, the majority’s six justices hung up their robes for the night confident that such could never happen. They had finally stuck it to Tim Eyman.
On Monday, Mr. Eyman responded with a ballot initiative that’s an ultimatum to Olympia: Either put a tax-limitation amendment on the ballot, or we the people will cut our own taxes. If approved, the measure would slice 1 percentage point from the state sales tax, depriving the state of $1 billion in revenue. If the Legislature refers a constitutional amendment to the ballot by April 15, 2015, there wouldn’t be a cut.
Money is the universal language of lawmakers. “If they don’t want to let us vote,” Mr. Eyman tells The Washington Times, “then we get the biggest tax cut in Washington state history … . But it’s free if you let us vote.”
Whether it’s Congress or a city council or a homeowners association, all legislative bodies thrive on coercive enactments to change behavior. If the public doesn’t buy curlicue fluorescent light bulbs, they’ll pass laws banning bulbs that work. Each time Washington’s voters enacted a tax-limitation bill, a misbehaving Legislature came up with a loophole. If Mr. Eyman succeeds with his latest ploy, this would be a permanent fix.
The initiative is further a needed splash of cold water in the face of the court. In his dissent from the court majority’s decision, Justice James M. Johnson predicted this day would come. “If the history of this great state can teach us anything, it is this: The power of the people will prevail,” he wrote. “If the legislature passes a tax the people oppose, the people will find a way to repeal it.” And so they have, and we raise a glass of leftover bubbly to salute Mr. Eyman.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Trump-Carson a 2016 dream ticket
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama fundraises as the world burns
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: No U.S. support for Christian peril
- EDITORIAL: Gun-shy Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore