You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reconsider the petrodollar economy

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

The United States depends on a system of oil-backed U.S. dollars, which is detrimental to world peace and threatens to destabilize the world economy. The infrastructure for a more reliable and less destructive backing for the dollar already exists in the form of electrical energy. The next step is to simply make the transition.

Since the official end of the gold standard in the early 1970s, the United States has used its status as a superpower to force major oil producers to sell oil only in U.S. dollars. This has created a worldwide demand for dollars, which has allowed America to maintain the dollar's position as the world reserve currency and has given the Federal Reserve the ability to print virtually unlimited money.

The entanglement between dollars and oil is known as the petrodollar, and it has become essential to the stability of the American economy. If oil producers began selling oil in other currencies, the petrodollar system would fail, and there would be no demand for the $850 billion printed by the Fed each month. The world economy would take years to recover, and the American economy would be grievously harmed.

With so much relying on the petrodollar, the United States must go through great lengths to protect it. When then-Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi pulled Libya off the petrodollar, the United States and the United Nations aided rebels who toppled the Libyan government and executed Gadhafi. Just weeks later, the new rulers of Libya went back to selling oil in dollars. Gadhafi had been a tyrant to his people for 42 years. Yet the only time we offered support was when the petrodollar was threatened.

Similarly, the United States, along with Russia, China and Europe, recently agreed to lift Iran sanctions — but do not be fooled by mainstream media or public speeches. The deal was not about world peace. It is no coincidence that soon after the deal was made, Iran agreed to once again sell its oil only in U.S. dollars.

The petrodollar system is flawed and only leads to war and debt. The dollar should instead be backed by a needed commodity that retains its value and doesn't require war to maintain. Electrical energy would be a perfect candidate owing to its close relationship with the economy and its dissociation from foreign affairs. It retains intrinsic value and has the ability to flex with demand without giving the Fed unlimited printing power, since electricity cannot be created out of thin air. The government can easily institute electrical-energy-backed money by promising to exchange dollars for a fixed amount of electrical energy measured in kilowatts, effectively standardizing the dollar with electricity. The government would then only print money to match the energy supply.

Moscow, Idaho

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts