- Hamid Karzai’s cousin killed by suicide bomber at Eid al-Fitr party
- Obama thanks Muslims for ‘building the very fabric of our nation’
- Israel flattens home of top Hamas leader, takes out power plant
- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
Obama seeks to salvage Afghan election
Question of the Day
Amid reports of widespread fraud and the possibility the entire Afghan presidential election will be delegitimized, President Obama on Tuesday called candidate Abdullah Abdullah and urged him to remain involved in the electoral process, rather than declare himself the winner and potentially throw the nation into chaos.
Mr. Abdullah told his supporters on Monday that he will claim victory in the contest, even though Afghanistan’s former finance minister, Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai, is significantly ahead in the current vote count.
The country’s Independent Election Commission has said no winner can be declared right now because millions of ballots are being audited for fraud, the Associated Press reported, casting a dark cloud of uncertainty over Afghanistan’s future.
The winner of the election will replace President Hamid Karzai, who has led Afghanistan since the U.S. toppled the Taliban government following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The White House says it’s imperative both candidates allow the process to play itself out and let allegations of voter fraud be investigated fully before either man attempts to take the reins of power.
“The forceful message the president delivered was to ask Mr. Abdullah to remain engages in the process,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters. “The important principle that is at play here is that the Afghan people should have a say, in fact they should be able to determine, the leadership of their country. In order to do that, we need to have agreed-upon processes in place to conduct those elections … The way to determine [the winner] definitively is for the prewritten rules that guide this process to be followed by both sides.”
• This article is based in part on wire service reports.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Russia in violation of 1987 missile treaty, White House says
- In politics, all states are 'border' states
- Libya now nation at risk with weak U.S. influence; embassy closes as chaos grows
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- White House adviser on 2016: Rand Paul more viable than Ted Cruz
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- EPSTEIN: All IRS roads lead to the archivist
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- PRUDEN: When the hangman botches the job
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- KEENE: Thinking outside nanny-state box with Paul Ryan
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq