- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
- Sarah Palin’s online channel hits snag as Stephen Colbert buys similar URL
- SWAT spends seven hours in standoff with empty home
- U.S. troops told not to eat, drink in front of Muslims during Ramadan
Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard: No air strikes in Iraq
Question of the Day
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii Democrat, said Friday she doesn’t even support the U.S. providing limited air strikes that the Iraqi government is asking for to help stabilize a civil war in the country.
“What real difference would it make on the ground?” she said on MSNBC. “Is it in the best interest of the United States to do that? And I would say those questions are not being answers in a way that would make me support that. This is a religious civil war.”
Ms. Gabbard is one of only two female combat vets in Congress who spent about a year deployed outside of Baghdad. She said the turmoil now in the country shows that despite the opportunity, weapons and training provided by the U.S. during the war, the decision to have a free country can only be made by the people of Iraq.
“I think what we’re seeing now is a symptom of the fact that no one can make the choice for that outcome other than the Iraqi people,” she said.
She said going into Iraq the first time was a huge mistake and we should not go back now that the situation in the country has devolved. America should not try to be the world’s policeman, she said, and should consider what’s best for the United States above all else.
“I think the United States’ obligation first and foremost is the interest of the United States , the national security interest of protecting our people and taking care of what’s important to the United States,” she said. “It makes no sense for us to consider going back there and getting involved in what is truly a religious civil war.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Jacqueline Klimas covers Capitol Hill for The Washington Times. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- House passes VA reform compromise
- Senate bill quadruples fines for colleges that stay silent on sexual assault
- Rep. Jeff Miller: 'Ain't no leash for VA'
- Newly confirmed VA chief greeted with lawsuit over military sex assault treatment
- Robert McDonald confirmed as VA secretary
Latest Blog Entries
- Miss. GOP chair: Huckabee distracting from GOP's reasonable pro-life stance
- Commerce Secretary 'optimistic' about U.S.'s economic standing worldwide
- Less than half of registered voters would re-elect their congressman, poll finds
- Half of registered voters in Va. would re-elect Sen. Mark Warner
- 2013 was second most polarizing year of Obama's presidency
TWT Video Picks
By Ted Cruz
Israel saves its enemies; Hamas endangers its friends
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Al Gore's climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- GOP report sees ties between rich donors, green 'nonprofits'
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- NAPOLITANO: Is the president incompetent or lawless?
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- House votes to sue President Obama over claims of presidential power
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world