- Obama to Central American leaders: I need help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
EDITORIAL: IRS: ‘The dog ate the emails’
The IRS uses a schoolboy’s excuse to escape congressional scrutiny
Question of the Day
Rose Mary Woods, President Nixon’s personal secretary, took the blame four decades ago for a mysterious 18-minute gap in an audio tape-recording of what was going on in the Oval Office during the Watergate investigation. Now the IRS wants us to believe that information technology has scarcely advanced from the days of reel-to-reel tape-recordings. The dog ate Lois Lerner’s emails.
For three years, Congress has been investigating Mrs. Lerner’s role in harassing the Tea Party, yet the IRS waited until last Friday to tell House committees that emails from the scandal’s central figure were “lost” in a hard-drive crash that conveniently left a two-year gap in Mrs. Lerner’s email record.
This is awfully familiar. How long before President Obama is standing behind a White House podium to proclaim he’s not a crook? Using the tax man to go after political enemies is one of the primary offenses in the articles of impeachment that brought down the Nixon administration.
In 1972, Miss Woods demonstrated that she could erase the tape “accidentally” by holding a pedal beneath her foot while reaching far across her desk to hold the erase button. The “Rose Mary Stretch” was hard to believe then, and it’s a bigger stretch to ask anyone to believe that no one at the agency responsible for handling the $2.9 trillion it collects from American taxpayers annually has ever heard of backup software.
It’s especially implausible since federal law says such records must be maintained in a way that prevents them from disappearing. The National Archives and Record Administration makes the rules for storage of executive branch records, and its rules say: “Agencies shall back up electronic records on a regular basis to safeguard against the loss of information due to equipment malfunctions or human error. Duplicate copies of permanent or unscheduled records shall be maintained in storage areas separate from the location of the records that have been copied.”
What would be the reaction of an IRS auditor if a businessman were to offer the “hard drive crash” defense for missing receipts documenting his business-expense deductions? He might find himself in handcuffs.
This act of defiance should be the final straw for the congressional investigating committees, but they find an obstacle in the way. Nixon used the Saturday Night Massacre to get rid of pesky prosecutors. Mr. Obama has Attorney General Eric Holder running defense. There won’t be a prosecutor, special or otherwise, appointed if he has anything to say about it. He has already been found in contempt of Congress over the Fast and Furious scandal, and Mrs. Lerner has been found in contempt for her selective testimony before Congress.
Congress must be more forceful in asserting its prerogatives. The House Ways and Means Committee has summoned IRS Commissioner John Koskinen to appear next week to answer questions about this latest excuse for failing to produce documents. The panel’s chairman, Dave Camp, is rightly furious at the administration.
“Frankly,” says Mr. Camp, “these are the critical years of the targeting of conservative groups that could explain who knew what, when, and what, if any, coordination there was between agencies. Instead, because of this loss of documents, we are conveniently left to believe that Lois Lerner acted alone.” That’s a stretch Rose Mary Woods couldn’t make.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Trump-Carson a 2016 dream ticket
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama fundraises as the world burns
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: No U.S. support for Christian peril
- EDITORIAL: Gun-shy Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab