- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Review: World Cup watching easier, less fun
Question of the Day
NEW YORK (AP) - World Cup games typically don’t line up well with the North American workweek, often taking place when you should be in bed or at work.
As much as it’s fun to go to a bar then, I appreciate having more options for watching games online this time around. Think about it: The first iPad came out just two months before the start of the last World Cup, in 2010. I had neither a smartphone nor a tablet then. Now I have both.
In the U.S., all of the matches are available online through the World Cup’s official television networks. For English-language coverage, that’s Disney-owned networks ABC and ESPN through the WatchESPN website and app. For the Spanish broadcast, it’s Univision’s website and Deportes app.
To access the games on WatchESPN, you must have a cable or satellite TV subscription with a participating provider - DirecTV is notably missing. You must already get the ESPN channel as part of the package, and you’ll have to enter your username and password from the pay-TV provider. Univision Deportes is showing the first 56 games for free. The rest of the games, starting with the quarterfinals, will also require a pay-TV subscription.
Unfortunately, you don’t have the option to simply pay for online streaming, the way you can in some other countries. You’re also blocked from those foreign streaming sites, just as ESPN and Univision is restricted to U.S. viewers.
Both apps streamed the games smoothly and clearly. I found the picture quality terrific on an iPhone 5, an iPad, a Nexus 7 Android tablet and a 5-year-old MacBook Pro laptop. With both ESPN and Univision, I was getting the same feed I would have gotten on television, though with a delay of about a minute because of how streaming technology works.
This has changed things for me, for better - and for worse.
During the 2010 World Cup, I left the office with two co-workers just before 10 a.m. because we had to watch the U.S. play Algeria in a do-or-die game. In the waning seconds of the tense, scoreless match, the U.S. star Landon Donovan knocked in a goal that sent the U.S. into the next stage of the tournament. The bar erupted; strangers high-fived each other and even threw a few hugs around. It was simply impossible to avoid having another beer, though it wasn’t quite noon.
Last Thursday, I watched the opening game between Brazil and Croatia, partly on my iPhone, partly on my iPad as I picked up the kids on the way home. I watched Friday’s mid-day game between Mexico and Cameroon on the Android tablet at my desk.
I wasn’t able to catch Friday afternoon’s superstar-studded Spain vs. Netherlands game live. So I logged out of Twitter, ignored news sites and stopped checking my personal email. Later that night, when the kids were in bed and all was quiet, I watched Robin van Persie’s balletic header and Spain’s collapse on my laptop, in what seemed like real time.
All of the games had moments of high drama, but none was accompanied by midday beers or cheering companions.
As much as I miss that camaraderie - and the beer - there’s no doubt that these new viewing options will allow me to watch more games than before. It’s incredibly convenient. Aside from a few nitpicks, the interfaces are simple and clean.
WatchESPN offers replays of every match, which is great for those who can avoid finding out scores as they happen. The replay interface is a bit clunky, though. When you click to start watching a 90-minute game, you get a feed that is more than four hours long. Much of it is a static screen saying the game is coming. The actual broadcast starts near the middle, and there might be a half-hour or more of hype before the actual game play. As you move a slider to forward to the actual game, you might accidentally see the score if you move it too far.
There are some other interesting features, though they aren’t particularly useful.
A “highlight reel” of the 90-minute Argentina vs. Bosnia-Herzegovina game is longer than the game itself. It has no play-by-play announcement, and it starts with aerial shots of the Argentina bus arriving at the stadium. Not exactly a highlight.
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world