- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Legal fallout: Petitioners struggle with government’s lack of consistency in standards on trademarks
Question of the Day
The government has granted dozens of trademark registrations that include the words “slant” or “slants,” but when Simon Tam, leader of all-Asian band the Slants, submitted his trademark application, federal officials ruled it was disparaging and rejected it.
Mr. Tam’s request is proving to be a key test case in trademark law, as both bureaucrats and judges grapple with how to impose consistent standards in a country with an increasingly diverse population, an online culture that spurs and magnifies complaints and a robust debate over what’s considered acceptable.
“They never considered it to be a slur until we started using it,” Mr. Tam, founder of what he calls a “Chinatown dance-rock” group, said in a telephone interview Wednesday afternoon.
He spoke just hours after the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruled in another key case, revoking a half-dozen trademark registrations held by the Washington Redskins NFL franchise. The TTAB ruled 2-1 that the team name is “disparaging of Native Americans at the respective times they were registered.”
Those who have struggled through the trademark system say consistency is sorely lacking.
For example, “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy,” a television show featuring five gay men who did life makeovers for straight men, was registered, but “Clearly Queer” was rejected. “Permachink” was accepted, but “chink proud” was rejected.
Part of the difficulty lies in how the government makes its decisions.
She pointed to the case of “squaw,” where the government denied a registration request for using it on clothing but approved its use for ski equipment. Squaw Valley, the California ski resort that hosted the 1960 Winter Olympics, made the trademark more natural in that context, adjudicators concluded.
“That’s an indication of how complicated these decisions can be,” Ms. Farley said.
In a prominent case decided in a federal appeals court last month, Pamela Geller, who gained fame for leading opposition to a mosque being built near the former site of New York’s World Trade Center, lost her battle to register a trademark for the name of her group: “Stop Islamization of America.”
The judges ruled that name “would be disparaging to a substantial composite of American Muslims” who embraced peace.
Thorny trademark cases usually send both sides — the applicants and government adjudicators — scrambling for dictionaries to parse word definitions. Adjudicators also will pore over any material they can find on the applicants, searching for how they use the words.
In the case of Ms. Geller’s group, she argued she was only trying to signal opposition to radical Islam, but the TTAB found writing on her website that, they said, “implicates Islam more generally.” The TTAB also looked at comments posted by users on her website, saying it gave a hint as to how the public viewed the group and its mission.
Having a trademark registration revoked or having an application rejected doesn’t stop a company from continuing to use it or asserting its rights against infringement, but it makes it more complicated to enforce, Ms. Farley said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's trial to test definitions of political corruption
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq