- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Colorado well-positioned for pollution standards
Question of the Day
DENVER (AP) - Out of all the states in the nation, Colorado offers the best sneak peek at what the nation would look like once President Barack Obama’s energy regulations take effect.
But critics warn it’s too soon to say Colorado’s energy plan won’t have negative consequences.
Colorado got high praise Monday in a plan from the Obama administration aimed at cutting carbon dioxide emissions from power plants by nearly a third over the next 15 years. Colorado was cited repeatedly as a model for reducing carbon emissions while managing to “dispatch power effectively in the short term and to ensure adequate capacity in the long term.”
Ten years ago, Colorado became the first state with a voter-approved renewable energy standard. And in 2010, then-Gov. Bill Ritter signed into law a bill requiring larger utilities to get 30 percent of their energy from renewable sources by 2020. That law has forced many electricity producers to switch from coal to natural gas.
Colorado has “led the nation over the past decade in confronting this challenge,” Sen. Mark Udall said in a statement Monday praising the state’s carbon emissions work in advance of the proposal by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Even as the federal government held up Colorado as a model, it proposed a standard Colorado may not be on track to meet. The plan calls for Colorado to reduce its carbon emissions by more than 35 percent from 2005 levels by 2030. It wasn’t immediately clear whether Colorado’s existing laws would enable the state to meet that benchmark.
“There’s still a lot to be clarified,” said Dustin Zvonek, Colorado director of the group Americans For Prosperity, which warns the EPA’s rules would cost billions and lead to higher energy costs. Zvonek said Colorado’s action to cut carbon emissions may have only prompted an even lower bar to meet.
“Are we going to be penalized or punished for the fuel-switching standard and therefore take an even bigger hit? That’s not clear,” Zvonek said.
Currently, Colorado has 12 coal plants and gets almost 66 percent of its electricity from coal-fired power plants. Colorado gets about 20 percent of its electricity from natural gas, with the rest coming from wind and other sources.
The state is also a producer of coal, though production has slumped. Last year, Colorado coal production hit a 20-year low of 23.8 million tons from nine mines, according to the federal Energy Information Agency.
Denver will host one of four hearings scheduled on the EPA’s proposed air regulations, scheduled for July 29.
Kristen Wyatt can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/APkristenwyatt
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world